Land Titling Impact Evaluation - Baseline Survey 2015
Uganda, 2015
Get Microdata
Reference ID
UGA_2015_LTIE-BL_v01_M
Producer(s)
Markus Goldstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Joao Montalvao, Christopher Udry, James Habyarimana
Created on
Sep 07, 2022
Last modified
Sep 07, 2022
Page views
14856
Downloads
93
- Data files
- cedp_bs_0_cover_2015
- cedp_bs_1_hhroster_2015
- cedp_bs_2_laborsupply_2015
- cedp_bs_3_assets_2015
- cedp_bs_4a_parcelroster_2015
- cedp_bs_4b_plotroster_2015
- cedp_bs_4c_croproster_2015
- cedp_bs_5_crops_season1_2015
- cedp_bs_6_output_season1_2015
- cedp_bs_7a_input_season1_plot_2015
- cedp_bs_7b_activity_season1_act_2015
- cedp_bs_8a_input_season2_plot_2015
- cedp_bs_8b_input_season2_crop_2015
- cedp_bs_9_parcdet_2015
- cedp_bs_10_landrights_2015
- cedp_bs_11_conflicts_2015
- cedp_bs_12_landmkt_2015
- cedp_bs_13_transfers_2015
- cedp_bs_14_migration_male_2015
- cedp_bs_15_inheritance_male_2015
- cedp_bs_16_percrights_male_2015
- cedp_bs_17_credit_male_2015
- cedp_bs_18_migration_female_2015
- cedp_bs_19_marriage_female_2015
- cedp_bs_20_inheritance_female_2015
- cedp_bs_21_percrights_female_2015
- cedp_bs_22_decmaking_female_2015
- cedp_bs_23_credit_female_2015
- cedp_bs_24_relspouse_female_2015
- cedp_bs_plotsize_acres_2015
- community_bl2015_public_release
Relationship of the disputant to the head of the household? [recoded] (q8_relantionsh_nv)
Data file: cedp_bs_11_conflicts_2015
Overview
Valid:
537
Invalid:
9021
Minimum:
1
Maximum:
96
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Width:
37
Range:
1 - 96
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HH head | 8 |
1.5%
|
| 2 | Spouse | 16 |
3%
|
| 3 | Son / daughter | 11 |
2%
|
| 4 | Parent of HH head or spouse | 23 |
4.3%
|
| 5 | Brother / sister of HH head or spouse | 106 |
19.7%
|
| 6 | Nephew / niece | 14 |
2.6%
|
| 7 | Other relative | 78 |
14.5%
|
| 8 | Non-relative | 261 |
48.6%
|
| 96 | Other | 20 |
3.7%
|
| Sysmiss | 9021 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.