SDN_2021_PFDSAS_v01_M
Peacebuilding Fund Durable Solution Analysis Survey - Darfur, 2020-2021
IDP returnees, IDPs, non-displaced and nomad profiling in Darfur
Name | Country code |
---|---|
Sudan | SDN |
Other Household Survey [hh/oth]
Household data was collected from 8 localities across the five Darfur states (Tawilla, Assalaya, Yassin, Sheiria, Nertiti, Undukum, Gereida, Jebel Moon). The profiling exercises in Darfur are aimed at: i. informing PBF programming and Action Plan development in each Darfur state/locality; ii. provide the baseline of the agreed upon PBF outcome/output indicators (for later measurement of impact); and iii. inform broader HDPN programming beyond the Fund. The sample size consisted of 10,914 households with a total of 60,154 individuals.
Sample survey data [ssd]
Individual and household
2021-05
Household: Demographics, livelihoods, land and farming, food security, housing, access to services, participation in public events, social cohesion, percepcion about displaced population, intentions
Individuals: Demographics, education, livelihoods
Topic |
---|
Protection |
Food security |
Community Services |
Education |
Livelihood & Social cohesion |
Return |
Crop Production |
Livestock/Animal Husbandry |
Income Generation |
Basic Needs |
Solutions |
Intentions |
Peace-building |
8 localities across the five Darfur states (Tawilla, Assalaya, Yassin, Sheiria, Nertiti, Undukum, Gereida, Jebel Moon)
All IDP returnes, IDPs, nomads in damrahs and non-displaced populations across five Darfur states' eight localities.
Name |
---|
UNHCR |
UNDP |
IOM |
UNICEF |
UN-HABITAT |
FAO |
JIPS |
Sampling Approach
The sampling followed a stratified multi-stage sampling approach in which villages were the primary sampling unit (PSU) and households were the secondary sampling unit (SSU), while stratification was done by target group. Accordingly, the first sampling stage consisted of selecting a sample of villages with probabilities that were proportional to size; villages with higher numbers of households had a higher probability of being selected for the survey. A random sample of households was then selected based on two approaches: systematic skips or systematic snowballing. This depended on the spatial distribution of the target groups in each village. For example, in all camps and return villages where only IDPs reside, systematic skips were done. In villages with more target groups, systematic snowballing was performed for each target group.
Sampling limitations & specifications
Start | End |
---|---|
2020-12-01 | 2021-01-31 |
Name |
---|
IOM |
United Nations Refugee Agency Microdata Library
https://microdata.unhcr.org/index.php/catalog/509
Original Archive Study ID: UNHCR_JIPS_SDN_2021_PBFProfiling_v2.1
Cost: None
Name | Affiliation | |
---|---|---|
Curation Team | UNHCR | microdata@unhcr.org |
PBF Sudan, DSWG Sudan, UNHCR, JIPS (2021). Accessed from https://microdata.unhcr.org.
DDI_SDN_2021_PFDSAS_v01_M
Name | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
UN Refugee Agency | UN | Metadata producer |
Development Data Group | World Bank | Metadata adapted for World Bank Microdata Library |
2021-09
Version 1 (December 2022). This version is identical to UNHCR DDI ID: UNHCR_JIPS_SDN_2021_PBFProfiling_v2.1, except the following edits were made:
-Document ID and Survey ID,