MDG_2018_HDCT-ML_v01_M
Human Development Cash Transfer Program Impact Evaluation - Midline Household Survey 2018
Name | Country code |
---|---|
Madagascar | MDG |
Name |
---|
World Bank |
The following was provided by CAETIC Développement to summarize the methodology used and constraints faced in collecting data for the midline survey.
As with the baseline survey, Ideas42 designed the mid-term survey methodology. It consists in a representative survey which includes two components: a household survey and an administration of a test, called MDAT, for children aged from 24 to 71 months old. The sampling method, the different parts of the household questionnaire, the MDAT test, and the different concepts of the mid-term survey were kept identical to those of the baseline survey, except some minor changes on the household questionnaire in order to keep a certain harmonization with the FIAVOTA questionnaire.
Sample size for the mid-term survey was 6006 households, comprising 1522 additional households, distributed among 925 beneficiary households and 597 control households. It is important to stress that these additional households were drawn from the same fokontany (primary unit) as for the baseline survey. For the MDAT test, sampled children were randomly drawn from an exhaustive list of eligible children (aged from 24 to 71 months old) identified within the sample of household.
Replacement rate for the TMDH household survey was about 13.5% (816/ 6006 households). Among these 816 households, 651 households were replaced because of their absence during the survey, 114 households were not found, and 45 households refused to participate in the survey (no consent).
From the 6006 surveyed households, 3748 were eligible for the MDAT test, representing 62.4% of the sample, from which 4903 children could be observed. For the MDAT test in particular, 591 children were replaced because of diverse reasons. Thus, in sum only 3376 children were tested, at a rate of 1 child per household. Indeed, 342 eligible households for the MDAT test were not surveyed because of refusal or unavailability of the child. Besides, no households’ nor mothers’ refusal were recorded during the administration of the MDAT test.
Start | End |
---|---|
2018-05-23 | 2018-07-09 |
Data collection mobilized a total of 144 individuals including 6 supervisors, 16 controllers, 122 investigators. Teams were endowed of all the necessary tools and equipment to carry out properly the survey (4x4 cars, laptops, generators, converters, GPS systems, and kits for children tests). Data were collected at rather a month after the last transfer, from 23rd May until 30th June 2018, while respecting the duration fixed by the terms of reference, namely 30 days after the last transfer payment.
As the main task of CAETIC Développement was to implement the established survey protocol and to make all the necessary effort to ensure high data quality, the overall approach adopted by CAETIC Développement was established upon the following aspects:
Name |
---|
World Bank |
Use of the dataset must be acknowledged using a citation which would include:
Example:
World Bank. Human Development Cash Transfer Program Impact Evaluation - Midline Household Survey 2018 (HDCT 2018). Ref: MDG_2018_HDCT-ML_v01_M. Downloaded from [uri] on [date].
The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
DDI_MDG_2018_HDCT-ML_v01_M_WB
Name | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Development Data Group | World Bank | Documentation of the study |
2022-11-23
Version 01 (2022-11-23)