Measuring Aid Flows: A New Approach 1975-1995
Angola, Argentina, Armenia...and 158 more, 1975 - 1995
Get Microdata
Reference ID
WLD_1995_MAFNA_v01_M
Producer(s)
David R. Dollar and Craig Burnside
Metadata
Created on
Nov 14, 2011
Last modified
Jun 14, 2022
Page views
62051
Downloads
41
- Data files
-
Average GE on
all BEDA loans
with
disbursements
during each
given year (Avg
BEDA GE) -
Bilateral Debt
forgiveness
used to adjust
bilateral
grants (B
Debtf) -
Bilateral
grants used to
construct BEDA
(B Grants) -
Total
disbursements
on bilateral
EDA loans (BEDA
Disb) -
Bilateral grant
equivalents
used to
construct BEDA
(BEDA GQ) -
Bilateral EDA
(BEDA) -
Memo item,
bilateral
technical
assistance
(Memo BTA) -
Average GE on
all EDA loans
with
disbursements
during each
given year (Avg
EDA GE) -
Bilateral Debt
forgiveness
used to adjust
bilateral
grants (B
Debtf) -
Total
disbursements
on EDA loans
(EDA Disb) -
Grant
equivalents
used to
construct EDA
(EDA GQ) -
Effective
Development
Assistance
(EDA) -
Grants used to
construct EDA -
Memo item,
total technical
assistance
(Memo TA) -
Average GE on
all MEDA loans
with
disbursements
during each
given year (Avg
MEDA GE) -
Multilateral
grants used to
construct MEDA
(M Grants) -
Total
disbursements
on
Multilateral
EDA loans (MEDA
Disb) -
Multilateral
grant
equivalents
used to
construct MEDA
(MEDA GQ) -
Multilateral
Effective
Development
Assistance
(MEDA) -
Memo item,
multilateral
technical
assistance
(Memo MTA)
1990 (V18)
Data file: Bilateral Debt forgiveness used to adjust bilateral grants (B Debtf)
Overview
Valid:
134
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
2
Range:
0 - 2105.7
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 80 |
59.7%
|
|
| 0.1 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 0.2 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 0.4 | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| 0.8 | 3 |
2.2%
|
|
| 0.9 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 1 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 1.2 | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| 1.3 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 1.5 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 1.7 | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| 2 | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| 2.1 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 2.4 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 2.5 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 2.6 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 2.8 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 3 | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| 3.3 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 4 | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| 4.3 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 4.6 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 5 | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| 5.1 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 6.1 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 6.5 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 6.9 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 7.1 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 8.5 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 10.1 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 10.2 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 13.1 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 19.4 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 26.4 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 32.8 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 36.3 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 44.1 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 61.4 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 73.5 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 147.8 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 152.4 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 193.2 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 297.3 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 355.6 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 525.3 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 2105.7 | 1 |
0.7%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.