Measuring Aid Flows: A New Approach 1975-1995
Angola, Argentina, Armenia...and 158 more, 1975 - 1995
Get Microdata
Reference ID
WLD_1995_MAFNA_v01_M
Producer(s)
David R. Dollar and Craig Burnside
Metadata
Created on
Nov 14, 2011
Last modified
Jun 14, 2022
Page views
61851
Downloads
41
- Data files
-
Average GE on
all BEDA loans
with
disbursements
during each
given year (Avg
BEDA GE) -
Bilateral Debt
forgiveness
used to adjust
bilateral
grants (B
Debtf) -
Bilateral
grants used to
construct BEDA
(B Grants) -
Total
disbursements
on bilateral
EDA loans (BEDA
Disb) -
Bilateral grant
equivalents
used to
construct BEDA
(BEDA GQ) -
Bilateral EDA
(BEDA) -
Memo item,
bilateral
technical
assistance
(Memo BTA) -
Average GE on
all EDA loans
with
disbursements
during each
given year (Avg
EDA GE) -
Bilateral Debt
forgiveness
used to adjust
bilateral
grants (B
Debtf) -
Total
disbursements
on EDA loans
(EDA Disb) -
Grant
equivalents
used to
construct EDA
(EDA GQ) -
Effective
Development
Assistance
(EDA) -
Grants used to
construct EDA -
Memo item,
total technical
assistance
(Memo TA) -
Average GE on
all MEDA loans
with
disbursements
during each
given year (Avg
MEDA GE) -
Multilateral
grants used to
construct MEDA
(M Grants) -
Total
disbursements
on
Multilateral
EDA loans (MEDA
Disb) -
Multilateral
grant
equivalents
used to
construct MEDA
(MEDA GQ) -
Multilateral
Effective
Development
Assistance
(MEDA) -
Memo item,
multilateral
technical
assistance
(Memo MTA)
1992 (V20)
Data file: Bilateral Debt forgiveness used to adjust bilateral grants (B Debtf)
Overview
Valid:
134
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
2
Range:
0 - 665.8
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 87 |
64.9%
|
|
| 0.1 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 0.2 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 0.7 | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| 0.8 | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| 0.9 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 1.1 | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| 1.9 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 2 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 2.1 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 2.3 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 2.4 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 2.7 | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| 2.8 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 3 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 3.1 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 3.3 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 3.6 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 3.8 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 4 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 4.7 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 5.3 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 5.7 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 6.1 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 6.5 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 6.7 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 7 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 7.5 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 7.7 | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| 9 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 11.3 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 12.1 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 13.3 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 13.9 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 16.5 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 23.6 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 28 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 51.5 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 60.7 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 68.1 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 78.8 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 168 | 1 |
0.7%
|
|
| 665.8 | 1 |
0.7%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.