Enterprise Survey 2009
Eritrea, 2009
Get Microdata
Reference ID
ERI_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
Producer(s)
World Bank
Created on
Sep 29, 2011
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
13362
Downloads
877
- Data files
-
Eritrea-2009-Indicator-full
data-
interviewer comments (a17x)
Data file: Eritrea-2009-Indicator-full data-
Overview
Valid:
179
Type:
Discrete
Start:
736
End:
866
Width:
131
Format:
Questions and instructions
Question pretext
INTERVIEWER COMMENTS (Problems occurred/extraordinary circumstances which could influence results)
Categories
| Value | Category |
|---|---|
| Cooperative | |
| Cooperative and open | |
| Cooperative and very good | |
| Cooperative but didnt have exact data | |
| Cooperative but reluctant in finance record | |
| Did not provide records | |
| Excellent | |
| Fair | |
| Good | |
| He doesn't use documents.He tried to answer from his mind and instant calculation | |
| He has a lack of understanding | |
| He was Good. | |
| He was Hesitant. | |
| He was a problem in understanding and he is new in the office,he was in the production section | |
| He was abit hesistant | |
| He was careless.He had a problem to understand the questions (may be he was not willing to answer such questions) | |
| He was confident.He used the establishment records | |
| He was cooperative | |
| He was cooperative enough even though he wasn’t giving the exact data(Assumptions) | |
| He was cooperative in giving information. | |
| He was coperative | |
| He was fair | |
| He was good | |
| He was happy to answer our questions.He answered our questions with the help of phone from finance and personels of the organisaton | |
| He was hesistant | |
| He was not open | |
| He was not using a document as a reference, but he was confident when answering | |
| He was ok and cooperative | |
| He was open | |
| He was positive | |
| He was really cooperative and it was really attractive | |
| He was really cooperative and really attrac | |
| He was totally coperative and was realy attractive | |
| He was very cooperative & honest | |
| He was willing to answer and use from the establishment records | |
| Hesitant in financial section | |
| It was excellent | |
| It was fair | |
| It was good | |
| It was ok | |
| It was very good | |
| It was very nice | |
| Lack of actual and real figures | |
| Lack of organised record keeping | |
| Lack of well organised record keeping | |
| Lack of well organised records | |
| Less productive due to imported impediments | |
| No | |
| No comment | |
| No comments | |
| Patient but not accurate in financial data | |
| Positive | |
| Positive responses | |
| Really cooperative and very attractive | |
| Relatively cooperative | |
| Reluctant | |
| Reluctant in giving financial records | |
| Reluctant to give actual data | |
| Seemed Genuine and gave honest answers | |
| She gave the answer with precise data | |
| She is good | |
| She is very cooperative | |
| She was cooperative | |
| She was cooperative. | |
| She was fair. | |
| She was good | |
| She was hesistant | |
| She was open | |
| She was open and nice | |
| Some answers were not certain | |
| Some of the information was missing | |
| Somehow cooperative | |
| The interview was completed smoothly | |
| The manager was abroad & his assistant wasn’t giving the exact amounts. | |
| The manager was busy but we conducted the interview with the help of finance head | |
| The respondent was cooperative | |
| The respondent was so busy I was waiting for1hr | |
| They didn’t answer clearly when asked about finance. | |
| Time was limited | |
| Time was limited to interview | |
| Very good | |
| Very nice but did not have enough time | |
| Very polite and cooperative | |
| Was good |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.