| Value |
Category |
| 1 |
The paypoint is too far to walk to |
| 2 |
The cost of collecting the cash transfer is too high |
| 3 |
The cash transfer is too low |
| 4 |
Targeting was not fair |
| 5 |
Transfer should be monthly |
| 6 |
There is too much pressure from relatives to be given part of the transfer |
| 7 |
Programme has caused tensions within beneficiary hhs |
| 8 |
Programme has caused tensions between beneficiary and non-beneficiary hhs |
| 9 |
Programme has caused tensions with other sub-locations |
| 10 |
Programme has disrupted households mobility patterns |
| 11 |
Prices have increased locally |
| 12 |
Programme has increased dependency |
| 13 |
Because of HSNP other programmes have ended in the area |
| 14 |
The HSNP money never arrived |
| 15 |
Programme has disrupted traditional livelihoods |
| 16 |
Households now have large debts |
| 17 |
Need more information about the programme |
| 18 |
We would prefer everyone to benefit because we are all poor |
| 19 |
Long time until payment starts |
| 20 |
HSNP beneficiaries are not able to benefit from other programmes (eg. Food for work) |
| 97 |
Other (specify) |
| 98 |
Don’t know |
| 99 |
No negative aspects |
| Sysmiss |
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.