Value |
Category |
1 |
The paypoint is too far to walk to |
2 |
The cost of collecting the cash transfer is too high |
3 |
The cash transfer is too low |
4 |
Targeting was not fair |
5 |
Transfer should be monthly |
6 |
There is too much pressure from relatives to be given part of the transfer |
7 |
Programme has caused tensions within beneficiary hhs |
8 |
Programme has caused tensions between beneficiary and non-beneficiary hhs |
9 |
Programme has caused tensions with other sub-locations |
10 |
Programme has disrupted households mobility patterns |
11 |
Prices have increased locally |
12 |
Programme has increased dependency |
13 |
Because of HSNP other programmes have ended in the area |
14 |
The HSNP money never arrived |
15 |
Programme has disrupted traditional livelihoods |
16 |
Households now have large debts |
17 |
Need more information about the programme |
18 |
We would prefer everyone to benefit because we are all poor |
19 |
Long time until payment starts |
20 |
HSNP beneficiaries are not able to benefit from other programmes (eg. Food for work) |
97 |
Other (specify) |
98 |
Don’t know |
99 |
No negative aspects |
100 |
N/A |
Sysmiss |
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.