IHSN Survey Catalog
  • Home
  • Microdata Catalog
  • Citations
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / KEN_2010_HSNP-FU1_V01_M / variable [F34]
central

Hunger Safety Net Programme Impact Evaluation 2010-2011

Kenya, 2010 - 2011
Get Microdata
Reference ID
KEN_2010_HSNP-FU1_v01_M
Producer(s)
Oxford Policy Management Limited
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Feb 19, 2014
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
49713
Downloads
1673
  • Study Description
  • Data Dictionary
  • Downloads
  • Get Microdata
  • Data files
  • 3moves
  • 3table
  • 5table
  • 6education
  • 6health
  • 6personnel
  • 6table
  • 7food
  • 7food1
  • 7other
  • 7other1
  • comq_linking_FU
  • comq_weights
  • coversheet
  • section3
  • section4
  • section5
  • section8
  • section9
  • section10
  • section11
  • section99
  • ClusterMaster
  • disaggregation_data
  • hh_weights_original
  • HHAsset
  • HHBeneficiaries
  • HHconsData
  • HHCopingStrategy
  • HHData
  • HHEmploymentProgramme
  • HHFoodAid
  • HHFoodconsData
  • HHImpact
  • HHLivestock
  • HHMember
  • HHMover
  • HHOpMon
  • HHPreambleTracking
  • HHProvidedFor
  • HHSampleRecord
  • HHTransfer
  • HHVisit

What have been the most negative aspects of the Programme? 3rd (IMPadQ02c)

Data file: HHImpact

Overview

Valid: 692
Invalid: 3854
Type: Discrete
Decimal: 0
Start: 195
End: 197
Width: 3
Range: -
Format:

Questions and instructions

Categories
Value Category
1 The paypoint is too far to walk to
2 The cost of collecting the cash transfer is too high
3 The cash transfer is too low
4 Targeting was not fair
5 Transfer should be monthly
6 There is too much pressure from relatives to be given part of the transfer
7 Programme has caused tensions within beneficiary hhs
8 Programme has caused tensions between beneficiary and non-beneficiary hhs
9 Programme has caused tensions with other sub-locations
10 Programme has disrupted households mobility patterns
11 Prices have increased locally
12 Programme has increased dependency
13 Because of HSNP other programmes have ended in the area
14 The HSNP money never arrived
15 Programme has disrupted traditional livelihoods
16 Households now have large debts
17 Need more information about the programme
18 We would prefer everyone to benefit because we are all poor
19 Long time until payment starts
20 HSNP beneficiaries are not able to benefit from other programmes (eg. Food for work)
97 Other (specify)
98 Don’t know
99 No negative aspects
100 N/A
Sysmiss
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Back to Catalog
IHSN Survey Catalog

© IHSN Survey Catalog, All Rights Reserved.