IHSN Survey Catalog
  • Home
  • Microdata Catalog
  • Citations
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / BGR_2010_FCSR3_V01_M_WB / variable [F1]
central

Financial Crisis Survey 2010

Bulgaria, 2010
Get Microdata
Reference ID
BGR_2010_FCSr3_v01_M_WB
Producer(s)
World Bank
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Sep 29, 2011
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
7964
Downloads
997
  • Study Description
  • Data Dictionary
  • Downloads
  • Get Microdata
  • Related Publications
  • Data files
  • Bulgaria-2010-FCS
    w3-full data-

a17x INTERVIEWER COMMENTS: (Problems occurred or extraordinary circumstances whi (a17x)

Data file: Bulgaria-2010-FCS w3-full data-

Overview

Valid: 90
Type: Discrete
Start: 176
End: 372
Width: 197
Format:

Questions and instructions

Question pretext
INTERVIEWER COMMENTS: (Problems occurred or extraordinary circumstances which could influence results)
Categories
Value Category
9 employees are in unpaid leave; e6 - initially given approximate figure: 150 000. Call back made and the new figure given, with huge unwillingness, is 100 000
According to respondent's opinion the firm is on the verge of shut down
All employees are part-timers
All employees are part-timers. Firm is on the verge of bankruptcy.
Approximate (rounded) figures - documentation not used, but e6 figure confirmed during the call-back
Approximate (rounded) figures. Respondent confident in firm's stability. Call-back: we were not able to re-contact the firm = no result
Approximate data
Approximate data for the work force
Approximate data. Salaries decreased with 50%
Approximate data; e6 figure confirmed - call-back made
Approximate figure for e6
Approximate figures
Approximate figures, especially when asked for percentages
Call back made and e6 verified versus the documentation.
Call back made: e6 verified versus the documentation
Call-back made for e6 - no clear answer given - something between 750 000 and 800 000
Call-back made for e6: figure given is according the documentation
Call-back made for e6: refused to answer. Figure given in round 2 used
Call-back: e6: answer again is DK
Call-back: e6: refusal. figure given in round 2 used
Call-back: e6: respondent gave approximate figure
Call-back: e6: respondent not willing to share information, answered DK again
Call-back: e6: respondents again answerd DK (and refused to check the documentation)
Call-back: respondent not willing to give amount for e6 - the figure from round 2 used
Call-back: respondent refused to give figure for e6
Call-back: we were not able to recontact the firm = no result
Certain and precise in all data provided - made checks vs. company documentation. B4 - they didn't make analysis on this
Certain in all data provided. They employ 10 temporary employees, but part-timers
Certain in most of the data and figures provided, only e6 is approximate figure
Comment on e2a: because of the reforms in healthcare system and precisely - shutting down of hospitals
Comment: we survive only because financial help from friends
Concerned about the data confidentiality. Call back: no result for e6 - respondent refused again
Confident in firm's stability
Data provided are according to official company documentation
Data provided by accountancy firm, last completed month - May, but data for work force are based on April
Declared that d7 and e6 are confidential data
Declared: sales are higher, but profit is lower. Call-back: for e6: respondent again answered with DK. The figure given in round 2 used
Elusive answers when comes to future periods / estimations. Call-back made for e6 - note that figure given is approximate
Initial figure for e6 - 320 000. Call-back made: no clear answer received, range provided: between 340 000 and 350 000
Initial figure for e6: 7,5 mln. Call-back made: the new figure given is 6,5 mln, but without willingness
Kind and responsive, approximate figures
Kind and responsive, but gave rounded figures
Most of the data - according to official company documentation. Old credit in foreign currency with maturity date in year 2015. Facing serious difficulties - all 10 employees are working part time.
No sales last completed month
Not sure in firm's future, believes that firm's situation is unstable. e6 - initially stated 1,2 mln. without check vs documents. Call-back made: no clear answer given - about 1 mln
Participated with unwillingness
Refused to answer d7 and e6 - generally any exact figure
Respondent confident in data given, re-confirmed both figures provided for d7 and e6.
Responsive and kind. Call-back made and e6 confirmed
Seemed confident in data provided and in firm's stability as well
Specific activity - retail trade with flowers. They are facing serious difficulties resulting in staff decreasing and problems in covering debts
Stated that firm is on the verge of shut down. Not willing to give precise answers.
The firm is facing huge difficulties. No sales during the last month. They intend to hire 30 workers.
The owner actually refused to give figure for e6 and confirmed that firm currently has no debts/liabilities
There is possibility firm to hire 10-15 seasonal workers, but part-timers.
There is possibility to discharge all employees because of the crisis. Call-back: e6: respondent refused to answer
They employ 4 seasonal workers, but part-timers
They got credit in March. Data verified versus the firm's documentation.
They tried to work on orders when materials are provided by the client, but didn't succeeded to pay to workers. They had to borrow. Now they own small store and own activity is retail trade.
They use 20 part-timers
Very kind, responsive and precise, only e6 is missing - not sure
b3 comment: big decrease in sales, e2a: firm's problems are due to wrong Government policies. Call-back: we were not able to re-contact the firm = no result
c1 - the employees are working on 4 hours
d6 and e6 - approximate figures
e2a - temporary constraints (recostruction activities on the street), e6 - approximate figure. Call-back: we were not able to re-contact the firm = no result
e6 - approximate figure
e6 - approximate figure. Optimist for firm's future
e6 and d7 figures confirmed versus firm's documentation (call-back made)
e6 coded refusal because 15 mln stated initially. Call-back made and new figure stated was 12 mln
e6 figure checked in call-back. Stated that this figure is rounded, but precise enough - could be plus-minus 5 000.
e6 figure checked versus the documentation - call-back
e6 figure confirmed during call-back, but explained it's an approximate figure
e6 figure confirmed during the call-back
e6 figure confirmed during the call-back - respondent stated this is the figure given by the accountants
e6 figure confirmed in call-back
e6 figure confirmed in call-back, but respondent seemed to be not very confident
e6 revised in call-back
e7 and e6 - approximate figures. Call-back made and e6 re-confirmed.
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Back to Catalog
IHSN Survey Catalog

© IHSN Survey Catalog, All Rights Reserved.