Enterprise Survey 2009
Côte d'Ivoire, 2008 - 2009
Get Microdata
Reference ID
CIV_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
Producer(s)
World Bank
Created on
Sep 29, 2011
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
19651
Downloads
1618
- Data files
- Ivory_Coast_2009_idstd
interviewer comments (a17x)
Data file: Ivory_Coast_2009_idstd
Overview
Valid:
521
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
1056
End:
1135
Width:
80
Format:
Questions and instructions
Question pretext
INTERVIEWER COMMENTS (Problems occurred/extraordinary circumstances which could influence results)
Categories
| Value | Category |
|---|---|
| Accurate figures, good collaboration | |
| Approximative data | |
| Cooperative respondant but approximative data | |
| Data taken from financial statement | |
| Data was available in the company | |
| Difficulties in communicating with the respondant because of the understanding o | |
| Difficulties to have financial data | |
| Difficulty of communication | |
| Difficulty to find the adress but respondant very kind | |
| Everthing was good | |
| Everything was ok | |
| Financial stetements given by calling registered offices a abidjan | |
| God reception from the respondant | |
| Good colaboration | |
| Good collaboration | |
| Good impression of the respondant | |
| Good interview | |
| Good interview approximative data | |
| Good interview but the respondant was giving approximative amounts | |
| Good interview, | |
| Good interview, approximative data | |
| Good interview, hard to have financials data | |
| Good reception | |
| Good reception from the respondant | |
| Good reception from the respondant, | |
| Good repection | |
| I've been well received, | |
| Informations taked from financial statement | |
| Interview was a bit in a rush | |
| Interview was good | |
| Interview well done | |
| Interview went straight | |
| It was a bit difficult to get certain information, but i waas well received, | |
| Liability of the data because they were taken from th accouncy book | |
| Missundestanding between the different respondants on the data, | |
| No account for the company | |
| No accountancy document for the company | |
| No accountancy for the company | |
| No comment | |
| No obstacle fom the respondant in giving information | |
| No particular problem | |
| No problem | |
| No problem at all | |
| No problem during the interview, | |
| No problem during the interview, the repondant was well informed about his compa | |
| No problem, | |
| Receptive respondant | |
| Respondant appreciated the interview, good collaboration | |
| Respondant available | |
| Respondant cooperative, | |
| Respondant deid not want to give is turnover | |
| Respondant did not understand some questions | |
| Respondant gave answers without any hesitation | |
| Respondant gave approximative data concerning turnover | |
| Respondant had difficulties to answer on some questions | |
| Respondant had no problem in giving the amounts | |
| Respondant is kind good interview | |
| Respondant never had accountancy for his company | |
| Respondant open | |
| Respondant very cooperative | |
| Respondant was a bit in a hurry | |
| Respondant was available | |
| Respondant was available but did not master the turnover | |
| Respondant was cooperative | |
| Respondant was courteous and very reliable because he seemed to master the amoun | |
| Respondant was estimating the amounts | |
| Respondant was friendly | |
| Respondant was kind | |
| Respondant was open | |
| Respondant was open and gave data | |
| Respondant willing to answer any question | |
| Smiling respondant | |
| Some difficulties in giving data | |
| Some difficulties in giving the data | |
| Suspiciouse respondant | |
| Suspiciouse respondant but honest | |
| The accountancy is well kept despite the fact that the respondant has not been t | |
| The collabopation was good | |
| The establishment has no accountancy | |
| The inter view was very good, | |
| The interview was cut several times because of some riots going on, | |
| The interview was good | |
| The interview was vrey good but the respondant does not keep any accountancy for | |
| The interview went on good, the respondant was always referiing to his archives, | |
| The interview< was a bit complicated because the respondant was not cooperative, | |
| The resondant had some difficulties in giving exact amounts | |
| The respondant did not want to give his turnover, | |
| The respondant does not master his activity | |
| The respondant is facing many problems of security about his company, | |
| The respondant looked not very reliable, | |
| The respondant was giviing some answers on the spot but for the others he was lo | |
| The respondant was giving approximative data | |
| The respondant was hesitating to give permission for the workers+ interview | |
| The respondant was interested in participating, hopping that he would receive so | |
| The respondant was not giving all information from his computer, | |
| The respondant was sceptic | |
| The respondant was totally available | |
| Very cooperztive, | |
| Very good interview | |
| Very good interview good cooperation of the respondant data are very exact | |
| Very satisfying | |
| We've hardly got information, | |
| approximative data but good interview | |
| approximative data | |
| approximative data, susspisious respondant | |
| availabilty of the respondant | |
| company created during year 2008 | |
| credible data | |
| credible data but respondant afraid | |
| data read in the financial statements | |
| difficult interview beceause the respondant was illileracy | |
| difficulties about getting right financial precisions | |
| difficulties to estimate financial data | |
| difficulties to have financial data | |
| difficulty of communication | |
| difficulty to have financial data | |
| estinate data | |
| everything went fine in total, | |
| finacial statements not well prepared | |
| financial statement well treated instead of the respondant illiteracy | |
| financial statement not well prepared | |
| firm created during year 2007,hence lack of total annual sales | |
| good collaboration | |
| good collaboration but approximative data | |
| good collaboration but because of no accountancy, data estimated | |
| good collaboration but respondant didn't know total annual sales of years before | |
| good collaboration credible data, good manager | |
| good cooperation | |
| good cooperation exact data | |
| good erception | |
| good inter view | |
| good interview | |
| good interview the compagy exsited less than one year ago | |
| good interviw | |
| good reception | |
| good reception but the respondant hesitated giving some figures | |
| good reception no problem | |
| hard to obtain financial data | |
| information taken from financial statement | |
| informations coming straight from the financial statements | |
| instead off a long waiting good interview | |
| interview interrupted sometimes by clients,good collaboration | |
| it was hard to have fianancial data | |
| no accountancy | |
| no accountancy but figures are credible | |
| no accountancy, approximative data, respondant afraid | |
| no difficulty | |
| no peoblem | |
| no pro | |
| no problem | |
| repondant was available and open | |
| respondant avaible and credible figures | |
| respondant busy | |
| respondant busy but available to answer questions | |
| respondant gave approximative figures he refused to have his workers interviewe | |
| respondant gave all the informations | |
| respondant motivated, they pointeed out corruption | |
| respondant not enthousiastic,difficulties for giving figures | |
| respondant refused to let his employees been interviewed | |
| respondant sympathetic | |
| respondant was busy but he gave with precision all informations needed | |
| respondant was kind | |
| respondant was very suspicious | |
| respondent was convincing | |
| satisfied | |
| satisfying interview | |
| suspiciouse respondant | |
| sympathetic respondant | |
| the interview was fine | |
| the respondant is very very kind | |
| the respondant was suspicious | |
| too many difficulties to have financial data | |
| very cooperative respondant, data taken from financial statements | |
| very good collaboration | |
| very good collaboration, the respondant ask for funds | |
| very good cooperation, very modern and professionnal company | |
| very good reception | |
| very precised data | |
| very suspiciuous respondant | |
| young company |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.