National Panel Survey 2010-2011
Wave II
Uganda, 2010 - 2011
Get Microdata
Reference ID
UGA_2010_UNPS_v03_M
Producer(s)
Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS)
Created on
Dec 23, 2014
Last modified
Sep 07, 2022
Page views
139055
Downloads
4843
- Data files
- AGSEC2
- AGSEC2A
- AGSEC2B
- AGSEC3A
- AGSEC3B
- AGSEC4A
- AGSEC4B
- AGSEC5A
- AGSEC5B
- AGSEC6A
- AGSEC6B
- AGSEC6C
- AGSEC7
- AGSEC8
- AGSEC9
- AGSEC10
- CSECTION1
- CSECTION2A
- CSECTION2B
- CSECTION2C
- CSECTION3A
- CSECTION3B
- CSECTION3C
- CSECTION3D
- CSECTION3E
- CSECTION3F
- CSECTION3G
- CSECTION3H
- CSECTION3I
- CSECTION3J
- CSECTION3L
- CSECTION3K
- CSECTION4
- CSECTION4A
- CSECTION4B
- CSECTION4C
- CSECTION4D
- CSECTION4E
- CSECTION4F
- CSECTION4G
- CSECTION4H1
- CSECTION4H2
- CSECTION4I
- CSECTION4J
- CSECTION4K1
- CSECTION4K2
- CSECTION4L
- CSECTION4M
- CSECTION4N
- CSECTION4O1
- CSECTION4O2
- CSECTION5
- CSECTION5A
- CSECTION5B
- CSECTION5C
- CSECTION5D
- CSECTION6A1
- CSECTION6A2
- CSECTION6B
- CSECTION6C
- CSECTION6D
- CSECTION6E
- CSECTION6F
- GSEC1
- GSEC2
- GSEC3
- GSEC4
- GSEC5
- GSEC6
- GSEC7A
- GSEC7B
- GSEC8
- GSEC9A
- GSEC9B
- GSEC10A
- GSEC10B
- GSEC11
- GSEC12
- GSEC13A
- GSEC13
- GSEC14
- GSEC15b
- GSEC15BB
- GSEC15c
- GSEC15d
- GSEC16
- GSEC17A
- GSEC17B
- GSEC18
- GSEC18A
- GSEC18B
- GSEC19
- UNPS_Geovars_1011
- WSEC2A
- WSEC2B_1
- WSEC2B_2
- hh_sec10_2
- pov2010_11
In case there was no ,what was the main reason for the pre-harvest loss? (a5bq24)
Data file: AGSEC5B
Overview
Valid:
28
Invalid:
9385
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
100
End:
100
Width:
1
Range:
1 - 6
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Literal question
In case there was no harvest i.e. 0 in Col. 6a, what was the main reason for the pre-harvest loss?
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pests | 5 |
17.9%
|
| 2 | Animals | 9 |
32.1%
|
| 3 | Floods | 4 |
14.3%
|
| 4 | Drought | 3 |
10.7%
|
| 5 | Hailstorm | 1 |
3.6%
|
| 6 | Other | 6 |
21.4%
|
| Sysmiss | 9385 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.