IHSN Survey Catalog
  • Home
  • Microdata Catalog
  • Citations
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / ARM_2010_MCC-WMPHP_V01_M
central

Water to Market Post-Harvest Processing 2010-2011

Armenia, 2010 - 2011
Reference ID
ARM_2010_MCC-WMPHP_v01_M
Producer(s)
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., Consortium of AREG and Jen Consult
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Jul 07, 2015
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
2049
Downloads
545
  • Study Description
  • Downloads
  • Get Microdata
  • Identification
  • Version
  • Scope
  • Coverage
  • Producers and sponsors
  • Sampling
  • Survey instrument
  • Data collection
  • Data processing
  • Access policy
  • Data Access
  • Contacts
  • Metadata production
  • Identification

    Survey ID number

    ARM_2010_MCC-WMPHP_v01_M

    Title

    Water to Market Post-Harvest Processing 2010-2011

    Country
    Name Country code
    Armenia ARM
    Study type

    Independent Performance Evaluation

    Abstract

    The Enterprise Adoption Survey (EAS) was a one-time survey commissioned by MCA-Armenia to measure assistance, practices, and improvements associated with the Post-Harvest, Processing and Marketing (PPM) Subactivity of the Water-to- Market (WtM) Activity of the MCA-Armenia Program.

    The sample frame for the survey was all enterprises, farmer groups, and individuals who had received PPM assistance by September 2010.The survey was fielded by a consortium of AREG, an Armenia-based NGO, and Jen Consult in 2010/2011, after all survey respondents had received PPM assistance. In-person interviews were conducted with respondents at their place of business or residence.

    The survey is designed to elicit a range of qualitative and quantitative information. Questions regarding assistance activities and practices were generally qualitative and open-ended, whereas questions regarding improvements were generally quantitative and multiple-choice.

    Kind of Data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Unit of Analysis

    The units of analysis are enterprises, farmer groups, and individual business owners/non-registered producers. Batteries of questions are designed for each of these units.

    Version

    Version Description

    Anonymized dataset for public distribution

    Scope

    Notes

    Enterprise, agricultural produce, water, famer group, ACDI/VOCA

    Coverage

    Geographic Coverage

    All 11 Armenian marzes including Yerevan.

    Universe

    Project-assisted enterprises/farmer groups/individuals

    Producers and sponsors

    Primary investigators
    Name
    Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
    Consortium of AREG and Jen Consult
    Funding Agency/Sponsor
    Name
    Millennium Challenge Corporation
    MCA-Armenia

    Sampling

    Sampling Procedure

    The sample frame covered all 212 enterprises, farmer groups and individual producers assisted by MCA-Armenia through ACDI/VOCA by the end of Compact Year 4 (end of September 2010). Aggregation of the ACDI/VOCA database showed that 40.6% of units covered under the sample frame were farmer groups, 26.4% were commercial organization, 25.5% individuals and 7.5% non-commercial organizations. The participant type is indicated in the variable W7: assistance unit. No stratification or strategy to account for refusals was employed, as these were not necessary.

    The study sample is representative of all PPM participants as of September 2010, as it is a census of these participants. The sample frame was derived from the implementer's list of program participants. AREG verified the existence of each participant in the frame and updated participants' demographic and contact information.

    The sample frame covered all RA marzes and the capital city of Yerevan. The distribution of sample frame units across Armenia according to ACDI/VOCA database shows that the most targeted marzes within the project were Armavir, Ararat and Aragatsotn marzes, and the least targeted were Shirak, Lori, and Synik marzes.

    Deviations from the Sample Design

    None reported.

    Response Rate

    90% (or 191 of 212) of assisted enterprises/farmer groups/individuals completed the EAS.

    Weighting

    No weights were used.

    Survey instrument

    Questionnaires

    There is one questionnaire for the EAS, but two versions. The EAS was designed both in Armenian and English under close guidance by MCA-Armenia and MCC and in close collaboration with ACDI/VOCA, the program implementer. Given that the survey is tailored to cover different types of assistance units-including enterprises, farmer groups and individual producers-the questionnaire was developed based on the close review of an available database of assisted enterprises/groups and types of assistance provided. In addition to information on assistance provided, the EAS asks about the adoption and use of practices, and future plans.

    Questionnaires were administered to enterprises, farmer groups, and individual business owners. In cases of enterprises and groups, interviews were conducted with the individual or individuals who were best qualified to answer. In some cases, some sections of the questionnaire were completed by one group member, and other sections were completed by another member.

    Data collection

    Dates of Data Collection
    Start End
    2010-10-11 2011-04-20
    Data Collectors
    Name Affiliation
    Jen Finance Engineering, and Management Consult Ltd. with AREG Scientific Cultural Youth Association Non-Governmental Organization
    Supervision

    Four main interviewers and one reserve interviewer were trained to administer the EAS. The sizes of each team depended on the number of units in the region. In some cases the interviewers visited marzes individually, depending on the results of appointments made in advance by sample verification team members. All the interviewers were coordinated and guided by a field coordinator, who directly supervised the interviewers and their data collection efforts.

    Field coordinators reviewed completed questionnaires for accuracy and verified adherence to the sample frame. The field coordinators reported to the team leader and senior researcher on a weekly basis. A fieldwork interim report was submitted to the client.

    Data Collection Notes

    Four main interviewers and one reserve interviewer were trained for the survey Topics in training included sample verification, quality control checks on completed materials, and coding. Interviewers were trained to understand the study, build cooperation and basic interviewing skills, and to fill in the questionnaires. Separate teams were designated for sample verification, quality control, and aligning coding with the code-book developed for the survey. The survey fielding approach was based on grouping of the sample units by their geographical location. Field trips were organized depending on the number of units in each marz. Interviews generally took place at respondents' homes or places of work. All the interviewers were coordinated and guided by the field coordinator. Interviews were conducted in Armenian, and responses were translated to English. Fieldwork consisted of two stages. The first stage of fieldwork, which spanned the first two weeks, was comprised of day-to-day reporting performed by the field coordinators. Reporting was performed on a daily basis in order to ensure the quality of sample implementation and questionnaires, and to prevent possible problems with instruments and sample. During this period, 15 regular debriefs with MCA-Armenia were held to address all issues related to survey implementation. At the second stage the coordinators gave mandatory reports on weekly basis to the Team Leader (TL) and the Senior Researcher (SR) (and in case of problems, coordinators contacted the research team immediately). A fieldwork interim report was submitted to the client. Issues encountered during data collection: All of the interviewers in many cases had a subjective impression that respondents had been informed beforehand about the survey and its goals, and in some cases they even knew what kind of questions they would be asked. Some interviewees contacted ACDI/VOCA or USDA/CARD by phone during the interviews to clarify some details (e.g. year of beginning collaboration with them). For calculation of such cases, all the interviewers were instructed to write down on the last page of the questionnaire their evaluation of respondents' sincerity and other comments by the end of the interview.

    Data processing

    Data Editing

    After interviewers completed each questionnaire, the interviewers reviewed the questionnaire entries and submitted them to the field coordinator for cross-editing. During data entry in SPSS, mistakes were corrected using visual and program control.

    Access policy

    Location of Data Collection

    Millennium Challenge Corporation

    Archive where study is originally stored

    Millennium Challenge Corporation
    http://data.mcc.gov/evaluations/index.php/catalog/94
    Cost: None

    Data Access

    Citation requirements

    Millennium Challenge Corporation, Enterprise Adoption Survey 2010/2011 (EAS), Version 1.0 of the restricted use dataset (2013). www.mcc.gov.

    Contacts

    Contacts
    Name Email
    Monitoring & Evaluation Division of the Millennium Challenge Corporation impact-eval@mcc.gov

    Metadata production

    DDI Document ID

    DDI_ARM_2010_MCC-WMPHP_v01_M

    Producers
    Name Role
    Millennium Challenge Corporation Review of Metadata
    Mathematica Metadata Producer
    Date of Metadata Production

    2014-03-28

    Metadata version

    DDI Document version

    Version 1.1 (March 2014). This version uses an updated metadata template.
    Version 2.0 (April 2015). Edited version based on Version 01 (MCC-ARM-MPR-EAS-PPM-2010-v1.1) that was done by Millennium Challenge Corporation.

    Version notes

    Members of the 225 beneficiary groups of farmers and families

    Back to Catalog
    IHSN Survey Catalog

    © IHSN Survey Catalog, All Rights Reserved.