Investment Climate Survey 2003
Kenya, 2002 - 2003
Get MicrodataCreated on
Sep 29, 2011
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
16990
Downloads
759
- Data files
-
Kenya-2003--full
data-1
(s306h3)
Data file: Kenya-2003--full data-1
Overview
Valid:
76
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
1771
End:
1826
Width:
56
Format:
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category |
|---|---|
| ABOLISHED ALREADY & REPLACED BY TRIO | |
| ADMINISTRATION COST IS HIGH | |
| ADMINISTRATIVE COST. TOO MUCH BUREAUCRACY | |
| ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS ARE TOO HIGH | |
| ADMINISTRTIVE EXPENSES | |
| BUREAUCRACY IN THE GOVERNMENT SYSTEM | |
| BUREAUCRACY IS TOO MUCH | |
| BUREAUCRACY MAKE NOT USER FRIENDLY | |
| BUREAUCRANCY IN INDUSTRY OF TRADE | |
| CAN NOT QUALIFY | |
| COMPLICATED PROCESS/COMPETITIVE | |
| DISCOURAGED DUE TO CHANGE OF RULES | |
| DO NOT EXPORT DIRECTLY | |
| DO NOT NEED | |
| DO NOT NEED FACILITIES | |
| DO NOT USE | |
| DOES NOT DEED. | |
| DON'T QUALIFY | |
| DONT KNOW ABOUT IT | |
| EXPORT COMPONENT TOO LOW | |
| EXPORT TAKE SMALL PROPORTION OF BUSINESS | |
| FOR TEXTILE INDUSTRIES | |
| GOV'T BUREACRACY | |
| GOVERNMENT APPROVAL FOR EACH EXPORT CONSIGNMENT | |
| GOVERNMENT HAVE BEEN RELUCTANT TO GIVE US | |
| HAS BEEN BENEFICIAL BUT NO LONGER APPLICABLE | |
| HAS CLOSED DOWN | |
| HAS LED TO ONCREASE ON PROFITABILITY | |
| HAS NOT BOTHERED TO APPLY FOR COMPESATION | |
| HAS USED THE FACILITY | |
| HAVE BEEN USING THE FACILITY EVER SINCE ESTABLISHMENT | |
| HIGH ADMINISTRATION COST | |
| INDISPENSABLE- TO ENABLE IT COMPETE IN INTERNATIONAL MKT | |
| IT HAS BEEN SCRAPPED | |
| IT IS MORE DIFFICULT & BUREAUCRATIC | |
| IT MAKES NO DEFFERENCE | |
| IT WAS GOOD BUT NO LONGER THERE | |
| LEVEL FIELD MISSING | |
| NEVER EXPLOITED THEM | |
| NO COMMENT | |
| NO LONGER APPLICABLE | |
| NO PROBLEM | |
| NOT CONSIDERED | |
| NOT IN LINE WITH HIS BUSSINESS | |
| NOT REGULAR EXPORTERS | |
| NOT USEFUL | |
| NOT WITHIN THE EPZ PRODUCTION PROCESS | |
| NOT WITHIN THE LINE OF BUSINESS | |
| NOT WITHIN THE LINE OF PRODUCTION | |
| NOW OPERATES UNDER TREO | |
| OF SLIGHT BENEFIT TO COMPANY. | |
| REDUNDANT | |
| RESPONDENT DIDN'T UNDERSTAND SOME OF THIS LAWS | |
| SECTOR NOT COVERED | |
| SHOULD BE REINTRODUCED OR THE TREO SYSTEM STREAMLINED | |
| STOPPED DUE TO TOO MUCH BOTTLENECKS | |
| STOPPED ON SOME PRODUCTS BECAUSE DUTIES SO LOW ANYWAY | |
| STOPPED WHEN DUTY WAS ZERO RATED ON RAW MATERIA | |
| THE BENEFIT/REFUND HAS BEEN MINIMAL | |
| THE LAW HAS BEEN CHANGED | |
| THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF EXPORTATION GROWTH SINCE 2000 | |
| THERE IS REDUCTION IN COST | |
| TIME CONSUMING | |
| TOO EXPENSIVE | |
| TOO MUCH BUREAUCRACY | |
| TOO MUCH PAPER WORK/BUREACRACY | |
| USED TO BE GOOD BUT NO LONGER APPLICABLE | |
| USED TO BE THERE BUT NO LONGER APPLICABLE | |
| VOLUME OF SALES LOST | |
| WAS BENEFICIAL BUT NO LONGER APPLICABLE | |
| WAS USING THE FACILITY BUT IT TURNED TO BE CUMBRSOME. | |
| WE LIKE IT BECAUSE ITS WELL UNDERSTOOD |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.