Education Quality Improvement Programme Impact Evaluation Midline Survey 2016
Tanzania, 2016
Get MicrodataCreated on
Jun 26, 2017
Last modified
Sep 07, 2022
Page views
121214
Downloads
3168
- Data files
- ml_v2_1_school
- ml_v2_1_teacher
- ml_v2_1_lesson
- ml_v2_2_pupil
s09.2 q08: 96 Difficulty - Other (specify) (ht_ml_eqtdiff96_other)
Data file: ml_v2_1_school
Overview
Valid:
25
Type:
Discrete
Start:
1538
End:
1653
Width:
116
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Didn’t attend any K3 trainings | 1 |
4%
|
|
| Difference in payment for the people in the same area | 1 |
4%
|
|
| EQUIP-T should train the teachers directly and not train teachers to teach others also allowance should be increased | 1 |
4%
|
|
| No specific time also there is no information given out | 1 |
4%
|
|
| delay on paymets | 1 |
4%
|
|
| extra time spent to teach while they are tired | 1 |
4%
|
|
| few training tools | 1 |
4%
|
|
| interfered with our break time | 1 |
4%
|
|
| it was too far away from the school | 3 |
12%
|
|
| mother language affects teaching the new curriculum | 1 |
4%
|
|
| respective teachers for targeted grades didn’t attend the training | 1 |
4%
|
|
| standard 1& 2 teachers should be given priority | 1 |
4%
|
|
| there were too many participants which made the discussion difficult | 1 |
4%
|
|
| time was not enough | 7 |
28%
|
|
| training held far and short notice was given | 1 |
4%
|
|
| transport difficulties | 2 |
8%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.