Value |
Category |
1st Respondent was coherent and very cooperative, but the second respondent who was the Director has rejected me and threatened me with vident words |
|
Coherent in answers |
|
Coherent. The company intends to expand it activity(Production of oxygen) |
|
Company enjoying lumpsum tax |
|
During the interviews no particular problem was encountered |
|
Everything went well |
|
I was received by the director,administration & finance who directed me to the accountant. The latter was open and did not hesitate. He asked for 15min coffee break |
|
In general the information provided were coherent |
|
Information provided are coherent. The respondent has been very clear in the management of his company that is facing difficulties |
|
Information provided by respondent was somewhat coherent |
|
Interview well conducted |
|
Interview went well |
|
Interview went well, the respondent was welcoming |
|
Interview without any difficulty |
|
No problem |
|
None |
|
Nothing particular to signal during the interview |
|
Questionnaire too long according to respondent |
|
Respodent was coherent he is planning to change activity(Fruit juice) |
|
Respodent was coherent. The respondent cannot say that there is one principal product. |
|
Respondent coherent |
|
Respondent coherent in his answers. He has lauded the results of the 2005 survey |
|
Respondent gave coherent answers |
|
Respondent very suspicious but sincere |
|
Respondent was cautious with regards to figures of the 2008, 2006 turnover and to the total annual cost of labor |
|
Respondent was coherent |
|
Respondent was coherent and sincere |
|
Respondent was coherent in his answers |
|
Respondent was coherent, he was upset when he was asked the employee size of 1955 and the annual total cost of labor |
|
Respondent was coherent. There was no incident The DDG was assisted by his Accountant |
|
Respondent was reserved and suspicious. He was not making any effort with the figures/turnovers. Interrupted at 10:35. Resumed at 11:00. Always suspicious. Ended interview at 11:26 |
|
Respondent was very difficult with the appointment |
|
Respondent was very open,calm.Several short interruptions due to clients but from the 25th page,the respondent showed signs of impatience. We however finished the interview well,in calm. |
|
Somewhat coherent |
|
The answers of the respondent were not coherent |
|
The appointment was very difficult to get they have a bad image of the World Bank. |
|
The company does not have a financial statement.No proper accounting system in place |
|
The company has restarted works in 2008.They have not been faced with payment of taxes, so he did not provide answer on that |
|
The controller was very suspicious of us but eventually we were able to reassure him |
|
The have a bad image of the World Bank.He hopes it will change |
|
The information on figures are estimates, not the exact figures. Concerning the interview, everything went well |
|
The interview took place without any major problem |
|
The interview was interrupted at 10:20 because the respondent has another appointment |
|
The interviewee has refused to answer questions that are not in direct connection with his business. He has also refused to provide the turnover of the company and related information. He rather asked us to refer to the internal revenue service |
|
The manager was absent and the secretary who is in the habit of answering all survey questionnaire mainly due to the fact that the manager is illiterate, was also answering a questionnaire of the central bank of west african states, she has de |
|
The respondant has been coherent in his answers |
|
The respondent cannot estimate the turnover because there is no proper accounting system it's a day-to-day business that every proceeds is gone to the proprietor of the business. |
|
The respondent found the questionnaire too lengthy. And on top o that refused to disclose information about the finances of the company. |
|
The respondent had a perfect mastery of the information on the company |
|
The respondent had difficulties in understanding the questionnaire |
|
The respondent has an arabic background. He was finding very difficult to asses certain figures |
|
The respondent has been very cooperative.There is a very important part of the information provided that is coherent |
|
The respondent hesitated at some point but the answers are somewhat coherent |
|
The respondent insisted that next time there should be incentives(monetary) for him |
|
The respondent is coherent in his thoughts. The figures given are reliable and reflect the reality of the company |
|
The respondent not found the statement of account |
|
The respondent refused to answer question k3. For the question j.10 instead of a license to import its an intention to import that they have from COTECNA. These answers are straight and without hesitation. He thinks you can have answers from BC |
|
The respondent refused to give his turnover and cost of labour |
|
The respondent said the company started it activities in 2008 |
|
The respondent was coherent in his answers |
|
The respondent was objective in his information that he gave. There exist a coherence in his answers |
|
The respondent was somewhat coherent in his answers. The figures areas estimates,collected with precision. |
|
The respondent was very coherent in his answers |
|
Their operation licence has been withdrawn and the company is under state control, awaiting a new buyer |
|
We have not had any difficulty during the interview |
|
Well conducted |
|
Why it is when there is these studies that we are contacted? You must not be silent all this while. Show us what do do to progress in our business. You must bring together the business/companies to discuss problems confronting them. For the emp |
|
none |
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.