ZMB_2007_WVS-W5_v01_M
World Values Survey 2007
Wave 5
Name | Country code |
---|---|
Zambia | ZMB |
Other Household Survey [hh/oth]
World Values Survey Wave 5 2009-2005 covers 58 countries and societies around the world and more than 83,000 respondents. The series includes the following waves:
Wave 6 (2010-2014)
Wave 5 (2005-2009)
Wave 4 (1999-2004)
Wave 3 (1995-1998)
Wave 2 (1990-1994)
Wave 1 (1981-1984)
The World Values Survey (www.worldvaluessurvey.org) is a global network of social scientists studying changing values and their impact on social and political life, led by an international team of scholars, with the WVS association and secretariat headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden. The survey, which started in 1981, seeks to use the most rigorous, high-quality research designs in each country. The WVS consists of nationally representative surveys conducted in almost 100 countries which contain almost 90 percent of the world’s population, using a common questionnaire. The WVS is the largest non-commercial, cross-national, time series investigation of human beliefs and values ever executed, currently including interviews with almost 400,000 respondents. Moreover the WVS is the only academic study covering the full range of global variations, from very poor to very rich countries, in all of the world’s major cultural zones. The WVS seeks to help scientists and policy makers understand changes in the beliefs, values and motivations of people throughout the world. Thousands of political scientists, sociologists, social psychologists, anthropologists and economists have used these data to analyze such topics as economic development, democratization, religion, gender equality, social capital, and subjective well-being. These data have also been widely used by government officials, journalists and students, and groups at the World Bank have analyzed the linkages between cultural factors and economic development.
Sample survey data [ssd]
2018-09-12
Version history: -v2018-09-12: Current official release General revision, mostly of missing labels. Inclusion of region, town, interview date in some countries when missing and found. Old releases: 2014-04-29
The Survey covers Zambia.
The WVS for Zambia covers national population aged 16 years and over, for both sexes.
Name | Affiliation |
---|---|
The Steadman Group Ltd. | |
Tracy Hammond | Markinor (PTY) Ltd |
Some houses were not easily accessible In some residential areas, sampling was hard due to the way the houses have been arranged. E.g. in storey houses. Sampling in rural areas was a challenge due to the distances between houses, this lead to the number of questionnaires being done per day in rural areas becoming low. As mentioned above, WVS sampling was done at different levels and stages. Probability sampling methods namely random sampling, were used in this survey, to select the various units of the survey. All respondents in the universe (countrys population aged 16 years and above) had equal chances of being selected to form part of the sample. However institutions such as prisons, hospitals, military bases etc, were not included in the sampling process. Random sampling was also used to select the enumeration area (EAs), starting points and households /dwellings. The EA is the lowest geography division level that the country is divided into for census purposes. In each EA, there are specific numbers of dwellings houses which are known to the census bureau.
Selection of Sectors/ EAs. The selection of EAs was done through random probability sampling technique, in which secondary list of EAs was drawn (randomly) from a list of all EAs in Zambia. The randomly selected EAs were then sed as the primary sampling point for the study. The sample allocated to each EA took into account the density of the areas i.e. high, medium and low. A specific number of EAs were allocated to each province and these served as entry level for the survey. The number of EAs per region took into account the rural/urban split as well. An average of 6-8 interviews were conducted in each EA.
Selection of starting point. Selection of the starting point (point where the interviewers enter the EA and starts selecting the households) was done by the supervisors. The selection was based on easily identifiable features/land marks such as school, church, mosque, school, hospitals, roads, etc. Once the starting point had been selected, the selection of the first household within the EA was commenced.
Selection of Household: From the starting point within the EA, the interviewers walked to specific direction alternately to the residential to identify the first household for the interview. Households were selected using the fourth left hand rule, whereby the interviewers counted houses on the left upto the 4th house, then conducts interview in the 5th house. At the end of the street, the interviews turns left and continue with the counting until the 4th house, the same process is repeated after every successful interview.
Substitution of Households: Households were substituted if they were in any way inaccessible or had no member meeting the requirements of the survey e.g. in terms of age, citizenship and residency. In such a situation, the interviewer would move to the next house.
Selection of Respondents: Once a household had been selected, the interviewer had the task of selecting the person to be interviewed(respondent) from the selected house. The respondent was selected using a Kish grid (see a sample below). In selecting the respondent, the interviewer listed all members of the household aged 16 years and above and who met other survey criteria, on the Kish Grid. They then identified the respondent by a working a line on the last digit of the questionnaire serial number with the number of people in the household
Call Backs/Substitution Criteria: In situations where the selected respondent in the household was not available at the time of call, the interviewers were instructed to make up to two additional recalls on different times of the day including evenings when the selected respondents were said to be at home. However, where the selected adult was not available for interview within the day of selection, interviewers were asked to regard such a case as a non response situation or ineffective call. This was also the case when the selected respondents expressed unwillingness to participate. No substitution of respondent within the same household/dwelling structure was allowed.
Remarks about sampling:
A lot of refusals/unwillingness to participate in the survey was witnessed among those in the social class A and B especially in urban Lusaka and Copper belt regions. Although the questionnaire was translated into 5 major languages, the field team still encountered language barriers and since some respondents could to speak any of the languages.
The sample size for Zambia is N=1500 and includes national population aged 16 years and over, for both sexes.
Total contacts 1563
Successful Interviews 1500
Too busy to participate 2
Refused/unwilling to participate 12
The respondent was illiterate 2
Household selected not accessible 5
Respondent selected on Kish grid not available 6
Respondent was drunk to participate 1
Does not meet age requirement 4
Selected respondent was sick 1
Could not get respondent after 3 call backs 3
Two full days, in addition to conducting of pilot interviews, were spent training the interviewers. Training occurred in English and although all the interviewers spoke English very well. If the interviewers were unfamiliar with the bigger and more technical words used in the questionnaire, time was spent on defining words and explaining the meanings of questions. The interviewer training consisted of basic research background and objectives, questionnaire training and general Interviewer Skills, to assist interviewers to approach respondents in a manner that would reduce refusals as well as gain the respondents trust to facilitate the garnering of more personal answers. Interviewers were also trained in sampling procedures including understanding how to read the maps illustrating the suburb and street in each selected enumeration area, the Random Walk procedure for dwelling selection, the left hand rule, using the Kish Grid for respondent selection and how to proceed when an identified dwelling is a block of flats, informal settlement or rural settlement without formal street names or household numbers. The training was conducted by both Tracy Hammond from Markinor, as well as Moses Odhiambo from the Steadman Group. The training was attended by all Interviewers working in Lusaka as well as the field supervisors who would be over-seeing the research in all other regions of Zambia. Each attending interviewer and field supervisor conducted one pilot interview implementing all that was taught, that included sampling procedures and questionnaire instructions. This allowed insight into areas interviewers and respondents were having difficulty with, as well as ensuring all interviewer instructions on the questionnaire were followed (such as the Do not read out instruction etc). To ensure this was achieved each pilot interview was attended by either Tracy Hammond or the executive from the Steadman Group. Interviewers implemented the questionnaire very well, with very few making errors. Otherwise, the interviewer immediately corrected any errors that they had been made aware of these. The same was true of the sampling procedures. All respondents were welcoming and eager to share their views on whatever topic was raised. The average interview length was minutes BUT pilot interviews conducted with illiterate respondents took significantly longer (average length: minutes). The major reason for this was that illiterate respondents were unable to refer to the show cards while considering their answers they had to be reminded of the response options available. Question v255 due to lack of accurate census data the interviewers were instructed to leave the question for office coding if the were not sure the size of the town the were in. Due to the length of the questionnaire, some respondents got tired in the process of interviewing. Question v165 was difficult to get a response as respondent who were not familiar with the term millennium development goals were asking for an explanation of the term. Distinguishing between question V242 which is the respondents working status and V 250 is the chief wage earner of household the two questions could only have the same responses if the respondent is the chief wage earner of household, this needed further explanation. Question V114 did not apply to the Zambian setting as respondent could not understand the political terminology of the left and the right, the question was answered based on the respondent understanding of the terminology. Question V 231 33, was difficult to get responses as the respondents were in fear of victimization from local authorities even if the interviewers had assured the respondents that this was an independent research. In question V252 respondents found it difficult to fit themselves to a class ,but the interviewers we guided to ask the respondent to describe which class they felt the belonged to.
Start | End |
---|---|
2007-03-30 | 2007-04-14 |
The main method of data collection in the WVS survey is face-to-face interview at respondent’s home / place of residence. Respondent’s answers could be recorded in a paper questionnaire (traditional way) or by CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview). The approval of the Scientific Advisory Committee in writing is necessary for application of any methods of data collection other than face-to-face interview. Following the sampling, each country is left with a representative national sample of its public. These persons are then interviewed during a limited time frame decided by the Executive Committee of the World Values Survey using the uniformly structured questionnaires. The survey is carried out by professional organizations using face-to-face interviews or phone interviews for remote areas. Each country has a Principal Investigator (social scientists working in academic institutions) who is responsible for conducting the survey in accordance with the fixed rules and procedures. During the field work, the agency has to report in writing according to a specific check-list. Internal consistency checks are made between the sampling design and the outcome and rigorous data cleaning procedures are followed at the WVS data archive. No country is included in a wave before full documentation has been delivered. This means a data set with the completed methodological questionnaire and a report of country-specific information (for example important political events during the fieldwork, problems particular to the country). Once all the surveys are completed, the Principal Investigator has access to all surveys and data. Non-response is an issue of increasing concern in sample surveys. Investigators are expected to make every reasonable effort to minimize non-response. In countries using a full probability design, no replacements are allowed. PIs should plan on as many call-backs as the funding will allow. In countries using some form of quota sampling, every effort should be made to interview the first contact.
World Values Survey
World Values Survey http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp Cost: None
Inglehart, R., C. Haerpfer, A. Moreno, C. Welzel, K. Kizilova, J. Diez-Medrano, M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin & B. Puranen et al. (eds.). 2014. World Values Survey: Round Five - Country-Pooled Datafile Version: www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV5.jsp. Madrid: JD Systems Institute.
The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
Name | Affiliation | URL | |
---|---|---|---|
Director of the WVSA Archive | WVSA Data Archive | jdiezmed@jdsurvey.net | http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org |
DDI_ZMB_2007_WVS-W5_v01_M_WB
Name | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Development Economics Data Group | The World Bank | Documentation of the DDI |
2020-02-19
Version 01 (February 2020)