IHSN Survey Catalog
  • Home
  • Microdata Catalog
  • Citations
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / LBR_2008_AFB-R4_V01_M / variable [F2]
central

Afrobarometer Survey 2008, Round 4

Liberia, 2008
Get Microdata
Reference ID
LBR_2008_AFB-R4_v01_M
Producer(s)
The Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA), Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana), Michigan State University (MSU)
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Jan 16, 2021
Last modified
Jan 16, 2021
Page views
8490
Downloads
277
  • Study Description
  • Data Dictionary
  • Downloads
  • Get Microdata
  • Data files
  • lib_r4_data.sav

Q98k.NEPAD/APRM useful initiate vs. empty one (Q98K)

Data file: lib_r4_data.sav

Overview

Valid: 1200
Invalid: -
Minimum: 1
Maximum: 9
Type: Discrete
Decimal: 0
Start: 904
End: 905
Width: 2
Range: 1 - 9
Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Literal question
98K. Which of the following statements is closest to your view? Choose Statement 1 or Statement 2.
Statement 1: The NEPAD African Peer Review Mechanism (NEPAD/APRM) is a useful initiative that will help promote good governance in Africa. It should be given all necessary support.
Statement 2: The NEPAD/APRM is an empty initiative that is unlikely to do anything to improve governance in Africa. We should not waste time or resources in supporting it.
Categories
Value Category Cases
-1 Missing 0
0%
1 Agree Very Strongly With Statement 1 397
33.1%
2 Agree With Statement 1 316
26.3%
3 Agree With Statement 2 169
14.1%
4 Agree Very Strongly With Statement 2 85
7.1%
5 Agree With Neither 6
0.5%
8 Refused 0
0%
9 Don't know 227
18.9%
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Interviewer instructions
Probe for strength of opinion: Do you agree or agree very strongly?
Back to Catalog
IHSN Survey Catalog

© IHSN Survey Catalog, All Rights Reserved.