IHSN Survey Catalog
  • Home
  • Microdata Catalog
  • Citations
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / MWI_2008_AFB-R4_V01_M / variable [F2]
central

Afrobarometer Survey 2008, Round 4

Malawi, 2008
Get Microdata
Reference ID
MWI_2008_AFB-R4_v01_M
Producer(s)
The Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA), Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana), Michigan State University (MSU)
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Jan 16, 2021
Last modified
Jan 16, 2021
Page views
11109
Downloads
282
  • Study Description
  • Data Dictionary
  • Downloads
  • Get Microdata
  • Data files
  • mlw_r4_data.sav

Q76c-mlw. Recipients choosen by community committee vs. by gov't or NGO (Q76C_MLW)

Data file: mlw_r4_data.sav

Overview

Valid: 1200
Invalid: -
Minimum: -1
Maximum: 9
Type: Discrete
Decimal: 0
Start: 717
End: 719
Width: 3
Range: -1 - 9
Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Literal question
76C-MLW. Which of the following statements is closest to your view? Choose Statement 1 or Statement 2.
Statement 1: If there is a transfer scheme for the poor, the recipients should be identified by a committee elected by each community.
Statement 2: If there is a transfer scheme for the poor, the recipients should be identified by government or by nongovernment officials from outside the community.
Categories
Value Category Cases
-1 Missing 2
0.2%
1 Agree very strongly with 1 425
35.4%
2 Agree with 1 217
18.1%
3 Agree with 2 142
11.8%
4 Agree very strongly with 2 347
28.9%
5 Agree with neither 59
4.9%
9 Don't know 8
0.7%
998 Refused 0
0%
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Back to Catalog
IHSN Survey Catalog

© IHSN Survey Catalog, All Rights Reserved.