IHSN Survey Catalog
  • Home
  • Microdata Catalog
  • Citations
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / ZAF_2008_AFB-R4_V01_M / variable [F2]
central

Afrobarometer Survey 2008, Round 4

South Africa, 2008
Get Microdata
Reference ID
ZAF_2008_AFB-R4_v01_M
Producer(s)
The Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA), Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana), Michigan State University (MSU)
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Jan 16, 2021
Last modified
Jan 16, 2021
Page views
8935
Downloads
166
  • Study Description
  • Data Dictionary
  • Downloads
  • Get Microdata
  • Data files
  • saf_r4_data.sav

Q98k. NEPAD/APRM useful initiate vs. empty one (Q98K)

Data file: saf_r4_data.sav

Overview

Valid: 2400
Invalid: -
Minimum: 1
Maximum: 9
Type: Discrete
Decimal: 0
Start: 1022
End: 1024
Width: 3
Range: 1 - 9
Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Literal question
98K. Which of the following statements is closest to your view? Choose Statement 1 or Statement 2.
Statement 1: The NEPAD African Peer Review Mechanism (NEPAD/APRM) is a useful initiative that will help promote good governance in Africa. It should be given all necessary support.
Statement 2: The NEPAD/APRM is an empty initiative that is unlikely to do anything to improve governance in Africa. We should not waste time or resources in supporting it.
Categories
Value Category Cases
-1 Missing 0
0%
1 Agree very strongly with 1 310
12.9%
2 Agree with 1 543
22.6%
3 Agree with 2 399
16.6%
4 Agree very strongly with 2 219
9.1%
5 Agree with neither 188
7.8%
9 Don't know 741
30.9%
998 Refused 0
0%
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Interviewer instructions
Probe for strength of opinion: Do you agree or agree very strongly?
Back to Catalog
IHSN Survey Catalog

© IHSN Survey Catalog, All Rights Reserved.