Afrobarometer Survey 2018, Round 7
Ghana, 2018
Get Microdata
Reference ID
GHA_2018_AFB-R7_v01_M
Producer(s)
Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD), Institute for Justice and Reconciliation in South Africa (IJR), Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP), Institute for Development Studies (IDS), Michigan State University (MSU), University of Cape Town (UCT, South Africa)
Created on
Oct 14, 2021
Last modified
Oct 14, 2021
Page views
4868
Downloads
84
- Data files
- gha_r7_data.sav
Q112. Interviewer Number (Q112)
Data file: gha_r7_data.sav
Overview
Valid:
2400
Invalid:
-
Type:
Discrete
Start:
1328
End:
1332
Width:
5
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Literal question
112. Interviewer’s number
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GHA04 | 20 |
0.8%
|
|
| GHA05 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| GHA07 | 9 |
0.4%
|
|
| GHA09 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| GHA13 | 60 |
2.5%
|
|
| GHA14 | 60 |
2.5%
|
|
| GHA15 | 60 |
2.5%
|
|
| GHA16 | 60 |
2.5%
|
|
| GHA17 | 50 |
2.1%
|
|
| GHA18 | 50 |
2.1%
|
|
| GHA19 | 50 |
2.1%
|
|
| GHA20 | 50 |
2.1%
|
|
| GHA21 | 52 |
2.2%
|
|
| GHA22 | 52 |
2.2%
|
|
| GHA23 | 52 |
2.2%
|
|
| GHA24 | 52 |
2.2%
|
|
| GHA25 | 56 |
2.3%
|
|
| GHA26 | 54 |
2.3%
|
|
| GHA27 | 42 |
1.8%
|
|
| GHA28 | 52 |
2.2%
|
|
| GHA29 | 52 |
2.2%
|
|
| GHA30 | 54 |
2.3%
|
|
| GHA31 | 54 |
2.3%
|
|
| GHA32 | 54 |
2.3%
|
|
| GHA33 | 64 |
2.7%
|
|
| GHA34 | 64 |
2.7%
|
|
| GHA35 | 64 |
2.7%
|
|
| GHA36 | 64 |
2.7%
|
|
| GHA37 | 58 |
2.4%
|
|
| GHA38 | 49 |
2%
|
|
| GHA39 | 58 |
2.4%
|
|
| GHA40 | 58 |
2.4%
|
|
| GHA41 | 58 |
2.4%
|
|
| GHA42 | 58 |
2.4%
|
|
| GHA43 | 58 |
2.4%
|
|
| GHA44 | 58 |
2.4%
|
|
| GHA45 | 54 |
2.3%
|
|
| GHA46 | 51 |
2.1%
|
|
| GHA47 | 54 |
2.3%
|
|
| GHA48 | 56 |
2.3%
|
|
| GHA49 | 54 |
2.3%
|
|
| GHA50 | 54 |
2.3%
|
|
| GHA51 | 54 |
2.3%
|
|
| GHA52 | 54 |
2.3%
|
|
| GHA53 | 26 |
1.1%
|
|
| GHA54 | 35 |
1.5%
|
|
| GHA55 | 35 |
1.5%
|
|
| GHA56 | 32 |
1.3%
|
|
| GHA57 | 32 |
1.3%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.