Afrobarometer Survey 2019, Round 8
Uganda, 2019
Get Microdata
Reference ID
UGA_2019_AFB-R8_v01_M
Producer(s)
Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD), Institute for Justice and Reconciliation in South Africa (IJR), Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP), Institute for Development Studies (IDS), Michigan State University (MSU), University of Cape Town (UCT, South Africa)
Created on
Oct 14, 2021
Last modified
Oct 14, 2021
Page views
5138
- Data files
- uga_r8_data_27oct20.sav
Q77b_UGA. Streamline the country’s electoral process: Replacing disqualified election winner by new election vs replacing with 2nd placed candidate (Q77B_UGA)
Data file: uga_r8_data_27oct20.sav
Overview
Valid:
1200
Invalid:
-
Minimum:
1
Maximum:
9
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
1175
End:
1176
Width:
2
Range:
1 - 9
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Literal question
A number of proposals have been made by stakeholders to streamline the country’s electoral process. For each of the following proposals, please tell me whether you disagree or agree with it
- If the winner of an election is disqualified before taking oath of office, a fresh vote should be held instead of declaring the second placed candidate as the winner
- If the winner of an election is disqualified before taking oath of office, a fresh vote should be held instead of declaring the second placed candidate as the winner
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | Missing | 0 |
0%
|
| 1 | Strongly disagree | 111 |
9.3%
|
| 2 | Disagree | 177 |
14.8%
|
| 3 | Neither agree nor disagree | 51 |
4.3%
|
| 4 | Agree | 434 |
36.2%
|
| 5 | Strongly agree | 386 |
32.2%
|
| 8 | Refused | 1 |
0.1%
|
| 9 | Don’t know | 40 |
3.3%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Interviewer instructions
Interviewer: Probe for strength of opinion