Afrobarometer Survey 2010, Round 4.5
Zimbabwe, 2010
Get Microdata
Reference ID
ZWE_2010_AFB-R4.5_v01_M
Producer(s)
Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD), Institute for Justice and Reconciliation in South Africa (IJR), Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP), Institute for Development Studies (IDS), Michigan State University (MSU), University of Cape Town (UCT, South Africa)
Created on
Oct 14, 2021
Last modified
Oct 14, 2021
Page views
4527
Downloads
69
- Data files
- zim_r4-5_data.sav
Q19. Preferences for Constitutional Reform (Q19)
Data file: zim_r4-5_data.sav
Overview
Valid:
1192
Invalid:
-
Minimum:
0
Maximum:
9
Mean:
3.78775167785235
Standard deviation:
2.44319187631623
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
213
End:
215
Width:
3
Range:
0 - 9
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Literal question
I am now going to read three statements about the Constitution. Please tell me which of these
statements comes closest to your own opinion.
Statement 1: The current Constitution meets the needs of Zimbabwe and should be retained.
Statement 2: The current Constitution should be amended to take account of changing political needs.
Statement 3: The current Constitution is unsuitable for Zimbabwe’s needs and should be completely replaced.
statements comes closest to your own opinion.
Statement 1: The current Constitution meets the needs of Zimbabwe and should be retained.
Statement 2: The current Constitution should be amended to take account of changing political needs.
Statement 3: The current Constitution is unsuitable for Zimbabwe’s needs and should be completely replaced.
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | Missing | 0 |
0%
|
| 0 | None of the above | 9 |
0.8%
|
| 1 | Agree with Statement 1 | 112 |
9.4%
|
| 2 | Agree with Statement 2 | 356 |
29.9%
|
| 3 | Agree with Statement 3 | 361 |
30.3%
|
| 7 | Not applicable | 289 |
24.2%
|
| 9 | Don't know | 65 |
5.5%
|
| 998 | Refused | 0 |
0%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.