Type | Working Paper |
Title | Village Funds, Education and Poverty Reduction in Thailand |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | |
URL | http://www.jyoungeconomist.com/images/stories/AED_ch10_pp_147_158_Fongthong_Suriya.pdf |
Abstract | The linkages between education and poverty can be considered in two ways (Oxaal, 1997). First, education can be used as a poverty reduction strategy to enhance skills and productivity among poor households. Most of the research evidence has confirmed that households with a higher level of education are less likely to be poor (Bonal, 2007; Cremin and Nakabugo, 2012; Gounder and Xing, 2012). Second, poverty is a constraint to educational achievement. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2010 argued that the biggest obstacle to education is poverty. In addition, the report showed that the poorest 20 percent of the households have the least chance of getting an education. They are 3.5 times more likely to be out of school than the richest 20 percent of the households (United Nations, 2010). Brown (2003) analyzed decision-making and education within resource-constrained households in rural China. He argued that children from households that are poor and credit constrained were much more likely to drop out of school. Therefore, the lack of credit is a major obstacle to financing educational investments for some of the poor. |
» | Thailand - Household Socio-Economic Survey 2009 |
» | Thailand - Household Socio-Economic Survey and Village/Community Fund Survey 2010 |