Type | Working Paper |
Title | Managing flood disasters under a changing climate: Lessons from Nigeria and South Africa |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2011 |
URL | http://humanitarianlibrary.org/sites/default/files/2013/08/OLORUNFEMI_NRSS_DISCUSSION_PAPER_I.pdf |
Abstract | There is a growing need to address vulnerabilities to climate change through adaptation efforts, complementing mitigation efforts aimed at reducing the rate and magnitude of climate change. At present, this development has taken place largely in parallel to the increasing shift from disaster management to disaster risk management. Disasters are associated with extreme weather events. Climate change directly interacts with the exposure to climatic extremes. The challenge in the context of adaptation is to move from the understanding that climate change is occurring to concrete measures that reduce existing vulnerabilities of human and natural systems. This study focussed on impacts and responses to flood risk among the urban poor living in the highly vulnerable informal settlements in the Cape Flats of the City of Cape Town, South Africa and those living along the Asa River channel in the city of Ilorin, Nigeria. It explores the underlying vulnerabilities of the two areas and the challenging problem of how to effectively shape human institutional responses to the risk of natural disasters with a special focus on floods. The social risk management (SRM) and asset-based approaches on which the study is based provide a conceptual framework for understanding the sequential links between risks; human exposure and sensitivity; the impacts of risky events; and risk management (or adaptation) strategies. The study utilised primary and secondary data. The outcome of the study shows marked differences in the vulnerability factors and the management of flood related disasters in the two study areas. Furthermore, it was revealed that the indigenous coping mechanisms employed by the poor may become less effective as increasingly fragile livelihood systems struggle to withstand disaster shocks. Strategies to reduce vulnerability should be rooted in vulnerability analysis and greater understanding of both household-level and macro-response options that are available to decrease the poor?s exposure to climate risk. |
» | South Africa - General Household Survey 2006 |