Type | Working Paper - The Finnish Institute of International Affairs |
Title | Hegemonic Project or Survival Strategy? |
Author(s) | |
Volume | 55 |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2007 |
URL | http://kms1.isn.ethz.ch/serviceengine/Files/ISN/28691/ipublicationdocument_singledocument/A1C03AFE-FBB3-400C-A9D2-907076AAA1C9/en/55.pdf |
Abstract | The Soviet Union's collapse brought to surface a complex ethno-political situation in the territory it formerly spanned. Changes in interstate boundaries separated various ethnic populations from their perceived homelands. This post-Soviet landscape has created policy dilemmas for the Russian government, as some 25 million Russians found themselves living outside the borders of the Russian Federation. How Russian leaders have dealt with issues pertaining to its 'compatriots' in the non-Russian Soviet successor states has become a subject of interest to Western observers. In particular, Western analysts have been observing the expression of ‘ethnic diaspora’ issues in Russian foreign policy. This study examines the extent to which Russian foreign policy concerns on the rights of ‘compatriots,’ particularly in terms of language status, can be used as a political tool to gain leverage in the ‘Near Abroad,’ especially in the western post-Soviet space. The western post-Soviet space, in this paper, refers to the Baltic states,2 as well as two members of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), Ukraine and Moldova.3 These states represent a region where East-West competition for regional influence clashes. Russian foreign policy goals on the language debate can thus serve as a partial indicator of how Russia attempts to cope with international challenges to its perceived 'sphere of influence.' |
» | Moldova - Population Census 2004 |