This paper explores the philosophy of land as an asset within the conflicting
paradigms of communalism and capitalism that affect many developing nations in
the Pacific region. Using Fiji as a case study, the nature of land ownership is
investigated within a framework of influence from the traditional chiefly systems,
religions, individual aspirations and external capitalist development impacts.
The concept of communalism involves 83% of the land area of Fiji. Within a static
non-evolving framework there are indications that hypothetically it could remain
operational. However, reality brings different pressures and motivations to bear.
Education and evolving individual aspirations can overtake tradition in this regard.
Entwined with this evolution is a reaction to a supplanted western land tenure
structure that adds to the conflict.
Through an investigation of contrasting philosophies and contemporary conflicts
between duty, obligation, tradition and capitalism this paper attempts to unravel the
confusion, suggesting directions for development and education in this critical issue.