Type | Thesis or Dissertation - Master in Theology |
Title | Submission to the Government (Rom 13: 1-7): biblical perspective with Christian ethical reflection for present day Myanmar |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2011 |
Abstract | Christians are made up of a small population in the pluralistic structure of Myanmar society.1 Though it can hardly be said that the present military junta2 In this situation, the government has been quoting Romans 13:1 to be Submissive to the government whenever they take fellowship with the Christian Churches. For instance, the above mentioned text has been usually quoted in the speeches by the Junta given to Christian congregation on special occasions such as the Church’s Jubilee celebrations and Christmas dinner. It has been said that according to this text, citizens are to be submissive to their respective government because God is the source of the authority of the government. But as it is widely and publicly known, the Myanmar government structure is unjust to the citizens. Human right violation, oppression and persecution are seen as their characters. If Romans 13 has no hostile motives against living religions (Buddhism is exception) of Myanmar including Christianity, it is clear that it has been trying to show care and concern to religious groups including the Christian groups in order to create political unity. The reason for hostility can be traced in the history of Theravada Buddhism which entered into Myanmar in the first century of the Christian Era. Buddhism and Burman (the largest ethinic group) have been interwoven throughout the centuries. Therefore, the concept “the Burmans are the Buddhists” was originally rooted from Burma history. There is a saying “To be a Myanmar (Burmese) is to be a Buddhist.” And it is frequently repeated in the modern era. The relationship between the state and the Buddhist religion, thus has been strongly influenced by the political development of the country. Consequently, the government and majority Myanmar (Burmese) could hardly see the Christians as the loyal citizens. is taken at its face value or out of its context, it can be misunderstood that the notorious Myanmar military government is appointed by God. This begs the following questions: Is God the source of Evil? Why God would appoint an unjust government? Should we give honour and submission to the evil government? Reading it in this way makes the text sound very misleading and erroneous. In 2007 (August-November) the Saffron Revolution demonstrated Myanmar´s Economic desperation. Buddhist monks peacefully protested the government by overturning their bowls (means to resist or to disobey) and refused to receive alms from the Myanmar generals (means not giving Buddha’s blessing). They demonstrated on behalf of the citizens, their donors of daily food who have been living in economic crisis. The uprising demanded the political and economic reforms from the government.3 Indeed, the problem therefore stems from the misunderstanding or misuse of Romans 13:1-7 which is intentionally or unintentionally ignored by the present Myanmar Churches. The uprising extended its tentacles to the Myanmar Council of Churches (MCC) and the Myanmar Baptist Convention (MBC), a member of MCC and the largest denomination in Myanmar. MCC and MBC chose to stand still as the loyal citizens to the government. MBC pointed out the Baptist doctrine of ”Separation of Church and State” as her reason for not joining in the demonstration. When the neighbouring religion protested the unjust situation, the Churches went silent. Although the uprising could not transform the country to be just and order, it stimulated the Christians to consider what should the church do when it comes face to face with the tyrant government? Does Romans 13:1-7 mean total silence to the Myanmar Churches? At the same time, the question about the Baptist doctrine of Separation of Church and State comes to the Baptist Churches. Does this doctrine prevent the Churches from upholding Justice? |
» | Myanmar - Population and Housing Census 1983 |