Type | Journal Article - NGA Center for Best Practices |
Title | Building a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Education Agenda: An Update of State Actions. |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2011 |
URL | http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED532528.pdf |
Abstract | F or several years, governors and education policy leaders have been working to strengthen science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education throughout the states. The immediate goals are twofold: increase the proficiency of all students in STEM and grow the number of students who pursue STEM careers and advanced studies. The reasons are straightforward: STEM occupations are among the highest paying, fastest growing, and most influential in driving economic growth and innovation. Individuals employed in STEM fields enjoy low unemployment, prosperity, and career flexibility. In short, STEM education is a powerful foundation for individual and societal economic success. Unfortunately, the United States has fallen behind in fully realizing the benefits of STEM education. Results from the National Assessment of Educational Progress over roughly the past 10 years show little improvement in high school seniors’ knowledge of math and science. Moreover, the Program for International Student Assessment, which provides cross-country comparisons, shows that U.S. students currently rank behind 25 countries in math scores and behind 12 countries in science scores. These factors may have contributed to another problem: the slow growth in postsecondary degrees awarded in STEM fields over approximately the past decade. This lack of strong degree growth is causing the United States to fall behind other countries that are surging ahead to create a STEM talent pool. For example, U.S. STEM degrees represent only about one-third of bachelor’s degrees, but they represent more than half of the first degrees awarded in Japan, China, and Singapore. The reasons the United States lags behind its competitors in producing STEM graduates have been well documented. They include: • Lack of rigorous K–12 math and science standards. Standards in math and science have varied greatly across states and, in many cases, do not test students’ abilities to utilize concepts and solve problems. • Lack of qualified instructors. A shortfall in the numbers of qualified math and science teachers in the classroom is a chronic problem in the K–12 system; many classrooms are staffed by teachers with neither a certificate nor a degree in their assigned subject area. • Lack of preparation for postsecondary STEM study. A student’s ability to enter and complete a STEM postsecondary degree or credential is often jeopardized because the pupil did not take sufficiently challenging courses in high school or spend enough time practicing STEM skills in hands-on activities. • Failure to motivate student interest in math and science. In most K–12 systems, math and science subjects are disconnected from other subject matters and the real world, and students often fail to see the connections between what they are studying and STEM career options. • Failure of the postsecondary system to meet STEM job demands. Although STEM jobs are expected to grow by 17 percent between 2008 and 2018, many higher education institutions— including community colleges, four-year colleges, and research universities—have not made an effort to increase their output of STEM degrees or certificates. |
» | Armenia, Australia, Austria...and 55 more - Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study 2007 |