Type | Conference Paper - Rethinking Development in an Age of Scarcity and Uncertainty |
Title | The Baltic States as aid donors: How can they best share their transition experience with their partner countries? |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2011 |
URL | http://www.unak.is/static/files/Frettir/Hilmar_Hilmarsson_EADI_Conference_Radstefnugrein.pdf |
Abstract | In spite of a setback during the current economic and financial crisis the Baltic States have made a remarkable progress in their economic transition since independence. Estonia and Latvia are according to the World Bank classification high income countries and Lithuania is an upper middle income country. Having recently implemented successful transition programs it can be argued that those countries have a valuable and relevant experience to share with other lesser advanced transition economies and developing countries. All the Baltic States have recent experience in working with international financial institutions (IFIs) and bilateral donors when advancing their own economic development. As EU member states the Baltic States are committed to increase their contributions to development cooperation. Multilaterally they already contribute to and participate in the management of the World Bank Group (WBG) and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). In addition to this they are participants in European Union (EU) development programs. All the Baltic States have also initiated bilateral development programs. Currently most of their priority countries are middle income countries in Europe and Central Asia. As the Baltic States increase their aid volume according to their EU commitments is seems that they will need to revise their development approaches, add new partner countries, advance their coordination with other donors and become more active in their participation in IFI where they currently are members. They also need to consider broadening their participation by becoming members in IFIs such as the regional development banks. It would seem ideal for the Baltic States to form partnerships with the Nordic Countries since they already cooperate and share coordination offices with them at the World Bank Group and the EBRD. Three of the Nordic countries, Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, have large aid programs and are active participants in the international dialogue on aid effectiveness that emphasizes developing country ownership, donor harmonization, use of local systems, development results and donor/partners mutual accountability. All the Nordic countries are also participants in budget support operations including Poverty Reduction Support Credits (PRSCs). However PRSCs are for low income IDA countries and the most of the partner countries of the Baltic States are not eligible for PRSCs. The paper will take stock of the current situation of the development programs in the Baltic States, including main partner countries and priority sectors and suggest new venues to expand their engagement as their aid programs become larger. This will include discussion about the current project approach and possibilities to engage in budget support. This could be done via Development Policy Lending (DPL) in partnership with the World Bank and other donors when the Baltic States assist their current middle income priority countries and in PRSCs if they decide to add low income countries to their list of priority countries. This article is based on a review of theoretical literature, interviews, secondary data and the author’s experience as a staff member of the World Bank Group for 12 years in three continents. |
» | Afghanistan, Angola, Albania, United Arab Emirates, Argentina, Armenia, Antigua and Barbuda, Austral - Doing Business 2011 |