Type | Working Paper |
Title | Powering up China: Uncovering the Drivers of Domestic Electricity Consumption |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | |
URL | https://www.aeaweb.org/aea/2014conference/program/retrieve.php?pdfid=1205 |
Abstract | Energy demand in China has grown at an alarming rate over the past fifteen years. In 1995, the Chinese economy consumed 33.25 quadrillion Btus of energy, and by 2011, that number had more than tripled to 109.62 quadrillion Btus (EIA, 2013). China surpassed the U.S. in terms of greenhouse gas emissions in 2006 and in terms of total energy consumed in 2009. Though forecasts vary about how quickly China’s energy demand will grow in the future, even at half of the recent rate, China’s energy use would double in 18 years. Existing forecasting models appear to have underestimated China’s recent growth in energy demand. For example, in its 2000 International Energy Outlook, the Energy Information Administration of the US Department of Energy predicted that China would consume 55 quadrillion Btus of energy in 2005, just 5 years later. China’s actual consumption was nearly 25 percent higher, at 67.92 quadrillion Btus. Similarly, some academics have noted that one factor contributing to the spike in oil prices in 2008 was higher than expected demand for oil from China (Hamilton, 2013). It is important to understand factors that drive energy demand in China in order to improve forecasts and to evaluate policies that might alter the path of energy consumption. Given the level of central planning in the country, a first-order question is how well neoclassical models of householdor firm-level energy consumption apply to China. In this paper, we focus on residential en- * Auffhammer: University of California Berkeley and NBER, 207 Giannini Hall, Berkeley, CA 94730-3310, auffhammer@berkeley.edu. Wolfram: University of California Berkeley and NBER, Haas School of Business, Berkeley, CA 947201900, wolfram@haas.berkeley.edu. Acknowledgements: We thank Joshua Blonz for valuable research assistance. All remaining errors are ours. ergy consumption and investigate how income growth, particularly among households close to the bottom of the income distribution, affects adoption of energy-using consumer durables. Consumers in urban China have recently acquired energy-using assets at an alarming rate. For example, there were 8 air conditioning units for every 100 households in 1995, and by 2009, there were 106 units for every 100 households (Auffhammer, 2014). Similarly, vehicle ownership in urban China has risen at almost 40 percent per year between 2000 and 2010, helping fuel China’s rapid growth in oil consumption (China Statistical Yearbook, 2001 and 2011). A previous literature has documented an S-shaped relationship between household income or expenditure level and ownership of appliances, cars and other energy-using assets (e.g. McNeil and Letschert, 2010). The S-shape is consistent with decisionmaking in which households at very low levels of income do not allocate additional income to acquire energy-using assets, but past a certain threshold, households become much more likely to use income gains to acquire refrigerators, cars or electric water heaters (Gertler, Shelef, Wolfram and Fuchs, 2013). This paper explores behavior consistent the S-shape in China. We combine province-level data on rural appliance penetration levels between 1999 and 2010 with province-level data on income distributions over the same time period. We use across and within province variation to investigate the relationship between poverty rates, controlling for the average income, and residential energy consumption. In spite of tremendous overall reductions, China’s poverty alleviation has been uneven, so we have reasonable variation in income distributions across provinces and over time. |
» | China - Rural Household Survey 1999 |