Type | Working Paper - Institutions Taking Root: Building State Capacity in Challenging Contexts |
Title | Timor-Leste Case Study: Ministry of Health |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2014 |
Page numbers | 303-345 |
URL | https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/20030/9781464802690.pdf?sequence=1http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0269-0#page=335 |
Abstract | The Timorese Ministry of Health (MoH) is a frontline health service institution that has shown credible results in a fraught and fragile country context. The ministry (formerly the Interim Health Authority or IHA) faced acute and particular challenges to begin. Yet it made good on the opportunities afforded to it to avert excess mortality, reduce high rates of infant and maternal mortality, halve the incidence of malaria, and provide basic health services at the village level. Through these and later achievements, the ministry gained the trust of a previously disenfranchised population and galvanized its durability and resilience. In contributing to a volume examining positive institutional experiences, this chapter examines how and why, in an otherwise low-capacity, low-income country, the MoH has maintained and deepened its positive development trajectory over time. As in the other cases, this chapter describes how the core underpinnings of its success are found in the three concentric circles that constitute its operating environment: the sociopolitical context in which it emerged and continues to function, its interaction with clients and external relationships, and its inner institutional workings (World Bank 2011a). Unlike the Ministry of Social Solidarity (MSS), which took root in its response to the 2006 Crisis, the MoH’s early success is a product of steady and consistent development and an ability to stay the course through periods of social dislocation, tension, and confl ict. From its inception at independence, the ministry’s role and functions were clear, but it had to make diffi cult choices to begin to address its health sector priorities, and to decide the sequencing of activities and resourcing. Among those decisions, health offi cials grappled with questions of how to build the foundations for health sector recovery, while at the same time responding to the humanitarian emergency and chronic health conditions that were unfolding across the country. To a large extent, it is the trade-offs and policy choices made by health administrators during this period and up to independence that determined the agency’s future success.1 From the early years of the MoH’s functioning and through deliberate efforts to deepen and expand its institutional performance, the ministry has maintained a steady path toward creating an integrated, results-oriented institution that is led by and for Timorese and responds to the unique and diffi cult conditions facing the country. The MoH has long stood out as an institution that other Timorese ministries have wanted to emulate, in large part due to its early accomplishments. Yet there was no watershed for the MoH, and its future success remains uncertain. It exhibited strong performance in planning and management in the period from the referendum to 2006, and many of its early efforts have yielded visible dividends. But its performance has fl uctuated in recent years. Persistently high rates of malnutrition and maternal mortality are worrying, and the ministry’s positive institutional trajectory is setback by deteriorating planning and budget links, volatility in procurement, human resource constraints, and political interference. Under these conditions, the future test for the ministry will be its resilience and durability in the context of increasingly politicized budgeting and administrative uncertainty. Despite this uncertainty, looking back at the sector’s initial recovery, several features stand out as having contributed to the MoH’s early ability to deliver results and secure legitimacy where there was previously popular mistrust. Many of these achievements are rooted in the ministry’s policy priorities and in its social and human capital and warrant deliberate attention, but before highlighting the MoH’s developmental attributes, this chapter examines the ministry’s record and situates its development in context. |
» | Timor-Leste - Population and Housing Census 2004 |