Complex, Complacent and Complicit in Compromising Development? A Case Study from the Developing South

Type Journal Article - Griffith Law Review
Title Complex, Complacent and Complicit in Compromising Development? A Case Study from the Developing South
Author(s)
Volume 21
Issue 1
Publication (Day/Month/Year) 2012
Page numbers 245-287
URL http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10383441.2012.10854739
Abstract
The way in which agricultural biotechnology is regulated and the property rights that are granted over the technology have important consequences and can impact – negatively or positively – on food security, the health of the agricultural sector, and the well-being and development of affected communities. The task of regulating the technology is not a simple one. It requires careful calibration, using a complex web of laws, to balance competing public and private interests. In this article, the use of patent-protected genetically engineered cotton seed by South African farmers, with a particular focus on small-scale farmers in Makhathini, KwaZulu Natal, is analysed through a sustainable development lens. Concerns are raised about the developmental impact of the proprietary technology, theoretical aspects of the property concept are discussed and possible areas for reform are outlined.

Related studies

»
»