Type | Working Paper |
Title | We won’t turn back: the political economy paradoxes of immigrant and ethnic minority settlement in suburban America |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2005 |
URL | http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/handle/1903/3230/umi-umd-3056.pdf?sequence=1 |
Abstract | This study investigates the intersection of suburban political economy and immigrant and ethnic minority suburbanization in the United States. Suburban areas in the United States are generally characterized by the absence of significant racial and class heterogeneity.1 Historically, suburban residential patterns were preserved and shaped by government-sponsored discriminatory housing loan programs and exclusionary fiscal zoning policies. Such programs were coupled with private market practices that promoted widespread biases in the rental, sale, and financing of suburban properties to non-whites (Danielson 1976; Drier, Mollenkoft and Swanstrom 2001; Jackson 1984; Massey and Denton 1993). In Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States, historian Kenneth Jackson (1985) writes, “Suburbia symbolizes the fullest, most unadulterated embodiment of contemporary culture; it is a manifestation of such fundamental characteristics of American society such as conspicuous consumption, a reliance upon the private automobile, upward mobility, the separation of the family into nuclear units, the widening division between work and leisure, and a tendency toward racial and economic exclusiveness” (4). Yet, the unprecedented post-1980 influx of immigrant and ethnic minority groups to some suburban jurisdictions may have altered this typecast of suburban life. |
» | United States - Census of Population and Housing 1990 - IPUMS Subset |
» | United States - Census of Population and Housing 2000 - IPUMS Subset |