Type | Book |
Title | Who gets the good jobs? Educational experiences that result in economic and social mobility |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2016 |
URL | http://www.sahe.org.pk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Who-gets-the-good-jobs12016.pdf |
Abstract | Who gets the good jobs? This study attempts to explore the link between schooling and job prospects by examining educational backgrounds, and profiles of mid and senior level managers in reputable firms in the three main urban centres in the country. Using the metric of individual starting salaries, we surveyed 828 people in mid and senior management level jobs at over one hundred firms. We chose these urban centres specifically because they have larger populations, greater job opportunities and higher enrolment and achievement rates than other cities. The study selected employees at middle and senior positions between 20 to 35 and 36 to 45 years of age. Our survey provides a snapshot of people with management level jobs. The study is not exhaustive. A large, nationally representative, household survey would yield better, more durable insights in terms of the link between education and employability. Such a study is urgently needed to inform education policy. Our survey is a small contribution to help spur a policy response. For parents, there is a wide variety of school options in Pakistan, which is why we elected to look at the type of school rather than the number of years of schooling. While no categorisation could do justice to the different educational experiences offered by all types of schools, we grouped schools into five baskets for practical purposes. These are: low and top tier government schools and low, mid and top tier private schools. The point of departure is the assumption that different types of schools will produce different salary levels among students down the line. We ascribe three factors that affect salary outcomes for students. First, the quantum of support they receive at home. Second, the quantum of support provided by the school, and third, exposure to the English language. We therefore created two indices, one each for home and school support. Exposure to English is covered by both. In addition, we asked two other questions: • How much of an advantage does education at a top tier school provide over the rest? • Do students from private low tier schools emerge with better upward mobility compared to students in government low tier schools? The school support (or school quality) index and the household characteristics (or home support) index helped us identify and track a range of questions about today’s mid-level or senior level managers’ experience at school: how educated a child’s parents were, to what level were their brothers and sisters educated, did a child get support with homework, how much access to the general electronic media they enjoyed and so on. |
» | Pakistan - Social and Living Standards Measurement Survey 2013-2014 |