A Political Economy of Social Protection Policy Uptake in Ghana

Type Report
Title A Political Economy of Social Protection Policy Uptake in Ghana
Author(s)
URL http://www.pasgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/A-Political-Economy-of-Social-Protection-Policy-Upta​ke-in-Ghana_F.pdf
Abstract
Since independence, successive Ghanaian governments have prioritised the welfare of
Ghanaian citizens in their governance strategies. The challenge has been the translation of
political intentions to the development and implementation of concrete social welfare policies
that improve the lives of those most in need.
This study of the political economy of social protection policy uptake in Ghana was
guided by two broad questions: 1) How do political, economic, social, historical and
institutional factors and actors support the drive for or resistance to social protection policy
uptake in Ghana? and 2) What are the broader policy implications for the current drive,
spearheaded by donors and the African Union, towards social protection policies and
programmes?
A mixed method approach to data collection was employed that included a desk
review, interviews with experts in social policy, a qualitative study of an urban poor community
which benefits from Ghana’s flagship social protection programme (the Livelihood
Empowerment Against Poverty–LEAP), and engagement with proceedings of social
protection working groups. The results suggest that there is political will and commitment
across a comprehensive range of social policy actors, both governmental and nongovernmental,
to maintain and scale up the current strategy on social protection. However,
current social protection initiatives reach a minority of potential beneficiaries due to limited
funding and poor targeting. Donor partners continue to provide a significant proportion of
funding for social protection initiatives, although a general freeze on donor support due to
Ghana’s current economic crisis may affect funding commitments in the short and medium
terms. We recommend greater investment in building the capacity of the public sector to
target, implement, monitor and evaluate social protection programmes more appropriately and
efficiently and the active inclusion of local CSOs and academic experts as technical support,
if social protection is to benefit the most vulnerable.

Related studies

»