Type | Book Section - Macedonia: Ten Years after the Ohrid Framework Agreement |
Title | Public Sector Dynamics in Central and Eastern Europe |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2012 |
Page numbers | 51-64 |
URL | http://www.nispa.org/files/publications/ebooks/nispacee-proceedings-varna-2011.pdf#page=53 |
Abstract | In 2001, Macedonia adjusted its structure of government and modes of governance in order to allow for participation of minority groups in policy making, but also to strengthen their representation in politics and public administration. Most of these policy solutions were envisaged within the Ohrid Framework Agreement. The aim of the government was to respond adequately to the power sharing claims from the ethnic Albanians, and it applied the principle of ethnic neutrality into the constitution.1 The implementation of the OFA is currently running the risk of being perceived as ensuring minority rights of only one community – the ethnic Albanians – rather than as building a multicultural country, where all ethnic communities are equally represented. This might create further inter-ethnic tensions in Macedonia. Macedonia is a country with a diverse population, differences in ethnicity2 , religion3 , and culture. This diversity has proved that it can create tensions, and even conflict. Political theory has distilled the reasons why inter-ethnic tensions occur and sums them up in several causes: (i) if groups feel socially excluded and aggrieved by a perceived lack of respect for their cultural identity and heritage; (ii) if there is growing mistrust between communities as they become more ethnically or religiously homogenous and (iii) if there are few channels for communication between different groups. |
» | Macedonia, FYR - Census of Population, Households and Dwellings 2002 |