Type | Working Paper |
Title | Poverty and inequality dynamics in South Africa: Post-apartheid developments in the light of the long-run legacy |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2009 |
URL | http://www.ipc-undp.org/conference/ems/papers/ENG/Leibbrandt_Woolard_Woolard_ENG.pdf |
Abstract | South Africa has a long and infamous history of high inequality with an overbearing racial footprint to this inequality. Many have seen the emergence and persistence of this inequality to be the major unifying theme of the country’s twentieth century economic history. Certainly, this is the key context to understanding why the issue of inequality has continued to dominate the post-apartheid landscape. There are two indicators of the post-apartheid political economy that have attracted special attention in this regard. The first is whether the evolving character of the post-apartheid economy and the policy efforts of the post-apartheid government have been able to start to lower these very high aggregate levels of inequality. Then, there is the related question of the composition of this inequality; specifically, whether the blunt racial footprint undergirding this inequality would start to grey and be replaced by new social strata and more subtle socioeconomic dynamics. Historically, the profiling and measurement of poverty have formed sub-themes of this broader inequality discussion. Under apartheid and even earlier the relegation of the majority of the population in non-white racial groups to the bottom of the income and wealth distributions in the country cleanly mapped onto their total dominance of poverty incidence and shares from at least the 1940s onwards. Showing this to be the case and illuminating clearly the poverty inducing features of apartheid policies were central tasks of many social scientists. While such evidence was widely aired in the international anti-apartheid circles, at best there was only grudging acceptance internally. The next section of this paper describes inequality and poverty trends in South Africa over the long-run. Census data provides the primary data for such comparisons. The focus is on aggregate indicators and also on racial shares. One other dimension is worthy of mention. The very name apartheid indicates the importance of race-based geography and race-based policy. Although formal policies of spatial separation by race are long gone, a lingering legacy remains in the contemporary prominence: the rural-urban marker of inequality and poverty. From a policy point of view the inheritance of huge group of poorly endowed and marginalized rural poor has greatly increased the difficulty and the costs of post-apartheid social delivery and effective poverty alleviation. |