HTTP/1.1 200 OKServer: nginx/1.12.2 Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 20:20:34 GMT Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Transfer-Encoding: chunked Connection: keep-alive X-Powered-By: PHP/7.2.10 Set-Cookie: ihsn_nada=0ko5upa03s2rltsafng23sq5b5vcoc6g; expires=Mon, 09-Dec-2019 22:20:34 GMT; Max-Age=7200; path=/; HttpOnly Pragma: no-cache Cache-Control: no-cache, must-revalidate Expires: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 05:00:00 GMT 1ed1 Resource Tracking On A Health Voucher Program In Kenya: A Need-Based Resource Allocation Perspective

Central Data Catalog

Citation Information

Type Thes ff8 is or Dissertation - Master Thesis
Title Resource Tracking On A Health Voucher Program In Kenya: A Need-Based Resource Allocation Perspective
Publication (Day/Month/Year) 2016
URL Tracking On A Health​Voucher Program In Kenya, A Need-Based Resource Allocation Perspective.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Briscombe, Brian et al (2010) noted that there are issues of lack of fairness in financing health in Kenya, Ministry of Health resource allocation being based on an incremental basis without due consideration to varied health needs of districts, a practice tended to benefit the relatively well endowed regions at the expense of the poor ones. This study was undertaken to track resources in the reproductive health voucher programme to establish if the resources were utilised based on the needs of the counties based on number of women of reproductive age and the poverty levels. The importance of this study is that this was an off-budget funding thus the need to establish if it is following considering needs of population in allocating resources. The study used the need-based resource allocation model by comparing the allocation per woman of reproductive age, and then per poor woman of reproductive age. The study also used the Lorenz curves and Gini coefficient to establish the level of inequity in resource utilisation. The Gini coefficient for the Voucher programme target counties of Kiambu, Kisumu, Kitui, Kilifi and Nairobi are all the below 25% compared to the national figure of 47.7% Human Development Report (UNDP, 2014)meaning there is low inequality in resource allocation from the programme. This was an expected outcome since the programme was targeting only the poor.

Related studies