Off-farm Employment and Income Poverty in Favourable Agro-climatic Areas of Tanzania: Evidence from Kilombero Valley

Type Journal Article - Developing Country Studies
Title Off-farm Employment and Income Poverty in Favourable Agro-climatic Areas of Tanzania: Evidence from Kilombero Valley
Author(s)
Volume 6
Issue 6
Publication (Day/Month/Year) 2016
Page numbers 47-60
URL http://www.forskningsdatabasen.dk/en/catalog/2306464944
Abstract
Income poverty in Tanzania as elsewhere in developing countries is predominantly a rural phenomenon and
affects largely households relying on subsistence farming. This is despite the fact that poverty reduction
strategies have devoted increasing attention on the role farm employment in enhancing household income. This
paper argues that, off-farm employment may have potential to contribute to reduction of rural households’
income poverty. Hence the main objective of the paper is set to examine effects of off-farm employment on
income poverty. Data was collected from a random sample of 309 households in the first quarter of 2014 in five
villages of Kilombero Valley, Tanzania using a structured questionnaire. Income poverty was analysed using the
Foster-Greer-Thorbecke (FGT) poverty index and two stage least square (2SLS) regression. Households with
off-farm employment income were found to be less poor based on all the three FGT parameters which are
incidence, depth and severity of poverty. Similarly, estimations from the 2SLS model showed that holding other
factors constant, engagement in off-farm employment led to increased total households income, and hence a
significant predictor of households’ poverty status. Other variables which were significant are; crop shock,
farmland location and land ownership. It is thus recommended that, rural development policies should be broad
based to consider the diversity of households’ income strategies including engagement in rural off-farm
employment activities. Increasing opportunities for off-farm income generation may be a route out of poverty
among rural households.

Related studies

»
»