Annex 5: Disaggregated results by geographic area and ethnicity

 

Tables  
Table A5.1 Key health variables by development regions, eco-zones, urban/rural split and eco-development regions:
Proportion of households using government health services in the last month
Proportion of households using other health services in the last month
Proportion of households rating government health services as 'good'
Proportion of reported contacts with government health services in last month when the health worker was available
Proprotion of reported contacts with government health services in last month when the required medicines were all available
Proportion of households willing to pay for improved health services
Table A5.2

Key health variables by ethnicity:
Proportion of households using government health services in the last month
Proportion of households using other health services in the last month
Proportion of households rating government health services as 'good'
Proportion of reported contacts with government health services in last month when the health worker was available
Proprotion of reported contacts with government health services in last month when the required medicines were all available
Proportion of households willing to pay for improved health services

Table A5.3 Households headed by farmers, average land holding and application for agricultural loans by geographic location
Table A5.4 Visits by extension workers, visits to centres and rating of services by geographic location
Table A5.5 Households headed by farmers, average land holding and application for agricultural loans by ethnic group
Table A 5.6  Visits by extension workers, visits to centres and rating of services by ethnic group

 

Figures (maps)  

Figure A5.1   

Proportion of households using government health services in last month

Figure A5.2   

Proportion of households using other health services in last month

Figure A5.3   

Proportion of households who rate the government health service as 'good'

Figure A5.4   

Proportion of contacts with government health services with all required medicines available

Figure A5.5   

Proportion of contacts with government health services with health worker available

Figure A5.6   

Proportion of households willing to pay for improved health services

Figure A5.7   

Proportion of households with farmer as household head

Figure A5.8   

Mean total land holding (ropani)

Figure A5.9   

Percentage of households who applied for agricultural loan

Figure A5.10   

Percentage of households ever visited by JT/JTA

Figure A5.11   

Percentage of households ever visited by NGO agricultural extension worker

Figure A5.12   

Percentage of households who ever visited agriculture/livestock centre

Figure A5.13   

Percentage of households rating government agriocultural service as 'good'

Figure A5.14   

Percentage of households rating government livestock service as 'good'

 

Table A5.1 Key indicators related to health service by geographic location

Location

% hh used govt health service in last month

% hh used other health service in last month

% hh rated Govt. Health service as 'good'

% contacts health worker available*

% contacts

all medicines needed available*

% hh willing to pay for improved health service

Development regions

 

              
 Far Western

6 (84)

18 (251)

3 (40)

98 (84)

42 (36)

64 (871)

Mid Western

16 (326)

31 (644)

7 (130)

97 (388)

44 (176)

63 (1260)

Western

15 (509)

24 (839)

8 (227)

95 (610)

38 (241)

65 (2203)

Central

11 (585)

20 (1035)

7 (354)

90 (616)

21 (145)

83 (4266)

Eastern

13 (516)

26 (1004)

6 (228)

91 (582)

25 (161)

59 (2239)

Eco-zones

 

              
                    
 Hills

13 (904)

25 (1639)

9 (603)

91 (992)

37 (406)

69 (4662)

Terai

13 (927)

24 (1784)

3 (236)

94 (1085)

23 (263)

70 (5178)

Mountains

12 (189)

18 (296)

12 (190)

96 (203)

43 (90)

65 (999)

Urban / rural split

 

              
                    
 Urban

10 (258)

25 (655)

13 (326)

94 (304)

27 (85)

68 (1757)

Rural

13 (2020)

24 (3773)

7 (1029)

93 (2280)

31 (759)

69 (10839)

Eco-development regions

              
                    
 Eastern Hill

13 (294)

33 (394)

10 (119)

94 (194)

45 (92)

72 (847)

Eastern Terai

13 (161)

20 (462)

4 (82)

90 (324)

12 (42)

50 (1147)

Eastern Mountain

19 (61)

46 (148)

9 (27)

89 (64)

38 (27)

78 (245)

Central Hill

10 (296)

25 (451)

11 (194)

81 (216)

27 (72)

84 (1509)

Central Terai

13 (227)

18 (517)

2 (62)

94 (333)

14 (50)

84 (2394)

Central Mountain

12 (62)

13 (67)

20 (98)

100 (67)

34 (23)

73 (263)

Western Hill

11 (103)

23 (558)

9 (214)

94 (443)

33 (156)

55 (1308)

Western Terai

16 (384)

29 (268)

4 (35)

98 (144)

46 (67)

85 (789)

Western Mountain

18 (22)

11 (13)

24 (28)

96 (23)

75 (18)

89 (106)

Mid-Western Hill

25 (210)

21 (179)

8 (61)

96 (109)

62 (69)

59 (505)

Mid-Western Terai

12 (100)

53 (454)

6 (51)

97 (260)

37 (97)

73 (621)

Mid-Western Mountain

5 (16)

3 (11)

5 (18)

100 (19)

53 (10)

47 (134)

Far-Western Hill

5 (24)

18 (111)

3 (15)

94 (30)

53 (17)

81 (493)

Far-Western Terai

5 (32)

18 (83)

1 (6)

100 (24)

29 (7)

50 (227)

Far-Western Mountain

9 (28)

18 (57)

6 (19)

100 (30)

40 (12)

48 (151)

 All Nepal (weighted)

13 (2278)

24 (4428)

8 (1355)

91 (2584)

29 (844)

70 (12596)

* Percentages are of contacts with government health services in the previous month

 

Table A5.2 Key health related indicators by ethnic groups

 

Ethnic group

% hh used govt. health service in last month

% families hh used other health service in last month

% hh rated govt. Health service as 'good'

% contacts with health worker available*

% contacts with all required medicines available*

% hh willing to pay for improved health service

Brahmin

 15 (448)

27 (831)

11 (314)

96 (536)

38 (211)

74 (2215)

Chettri

12 (406)

24 (839)

8 (256)

92 (454)

31 (151)

65 (2188)

Newar

9 (80)

24 (228)

15 (133)

93 (86)

33 (30)

77 (710)

Gurung/Ghale

14 (71)

19 (98)

9 (47)

91 (79)

35 (30)

84 (425)

Magar

11 (98)

21 (187)

11 (94)

91 (106)

32 (37)

65 (552)

Rai/Limbu

11 (99)

28 (243)

9 (73)

95 (110)

39 (45)

65 (567)

Tamang/Sherpa

9 (78)

23 (187)

14 (113 )

81 (70)

32 (28)

79 (649)

Muslim

11 (71)

23 (153)

4 (26)

98 (78)

25 (20)

75 (486)

Occupational

12 (322)

21 (571)

5 (123)

91 (362)

28 (109)

54 (1420)

Tharu

13 (150)

29 (352)

5 (53)

97 (179)

32 (60)

65 (770)

Yadav

14 (126)

20 (173)

2 (17)

88 (137)

20 (30)

74 (646)

Other (Terai)

13 (253)

21 (417)

3 (64)

96 (308)

18 (57)

78 (1513)

Other (Hills)

10 (71)

21 (144)

6 (42)

89 (73)

43 (35)

67 (449)

* Percentages are of contacts with government health services in the previous month

 

Table A5.3 Households headed by farmers, average land holding and application for agricultural loans by geographic location

 Location  % of hh with farmer as household head

Average area of land (Mean Ropani)

 % hh who applied for agricultural loan

Development regions

     
 Far Western

86 (1169)

14 (1386)

6 (81)

Mid Western

84 (1747)

18 (2075)

20 (351)

West

82 (2850)

15 (3464)

9 (278)

Central

62 (3216)

12 (5173)

16 (650)

Eastern

70 (2669)

16 (3838)

13 (370)

Eco-zones

     
 Hills

82 (5662)

12 (6885)

11 (702)

Terai

61 (4560)

17 (7424)

19 (963)

Mountains

89 (1456)

16 (1627)

4 (65)

Urban / rural split

 

     
 Urban

24 (266)

10 (2626)

11 (98)

Rural

73 (11678)

15 (15936)

13 (1730)

Eco-development regions

     
 Eastern Hill

83 (996)

16 (1211)

17 (177)

Eastern Terai

60 (1384)

16 (2308)

11 (164)

Eastern Mountain

91 (289)

23 (319)

10 (29)

Central Hill

74 (1321)

10 (1796)

12 (203)

Central Terai

50 (1427)

14 (2875)

24 (432)

Central Mountain

93 (468)

9(502)

3 (15)

Western Hill

84 (2025)

14 (2406)

9 (199)

Western Terai

78 (731)

19 (936)

10 (77)

Western Mountain

77 (94)

7 (122)

2 (2)

Mid-Western Hill

92 (795)

10 (863)

13 (108)

Mid-Western Terai

71 (607)

23 (852)

39 (243)

Mid-Western Mountain

96 (345)

21 (360)

0 (0)

Far-Western Hill

86 (525)

9 (609)

3 (15)

Far-Western Terai

91 (411)

20 (453)

11 (47)

Far-Western Mountain

80 (260)

17 (324)

6 (19)

All Nepal (Weighted)

71 (12300)

14 (18562)

13 (1828)

 

Table A5.4 Visits by extension workers, visits to centres and rating of services by geographic location

Location

% hh visited by JT/JTAs

% hh visited by NGO extension workers

% hh who visited agriculture / livestock centre

% hh rating agriculture service as 'good'

% hh rating livestock service as 'good'

Development regions

Far Western

2 (22)

0 (3)

3 (32)

1 (11)

1 (15)

Mid Western

3 (62)

1 (11)

14 (253)

4 (60)

5 (75)

Western

6 (177)

2 (50)

16 (516)

4 (115)

4 (120)

Central

3 (116)

3 (137)

6 (234)

2 (61)

2 (74)

Eastern

3 (77)

1 (40)

6 (173)

1 (35)

2 (39)

Eco-zones

Hills

4 (259)

1 (86)

12 (774)

3 (163)

3 (187)

Terai

3 (150)

3 (132)

7 (368)

1 (67)

2 (85)

Mountains

3 (45)

2 (23)

4 (66)

4 (52)

3 (51)

Urban / rural split

Urban

3 (27)

2 (17)

13 (119)

4 (35)

5 (47)

Rural

4 (454)

2 (241)

9 (1208)

2 (282)

3 (323)

Eco-development regions

Eastern Hill

3 (31)

2 (20)

7 (76)

1 (9)

1 (7)

Eastern Terai

3 (40)

1 (20)

5 (79)

2 (22)

2 (23)

Eastern Mountain

2 (6)

0 (0)

6 (18)

2 (4)

3 (9)

Central Hill

4 (64)

1 (24)

8 (129)

2 (29)

3 (44)

Central Terai

2 (36)

5 (95)

5 (95)

1 (13)

1 (14)

Central Mountain

3 (16)

4 (18)

2 (10)

4 (19)

3 (16)

Western Hill

6 (126)

2 (39)

20 (438)

5 (96)

5 (107)

Western Terai

5 (37)

1 (8)

7 (59)

1 (7)

1 (10)

Western Mountain

14 (14)

3 (3)

19 (19)

12 (12)

3 (3)

Mid-Western Hill

5 (38)

0 (3)

15 (128)

4 (29)

4 (29)

Mid-Western Terai

4 (23)

1 (8)

20 (126)

4 (23)

6 (36)

Mid-Western Mountain

0 (1)

0 (0)

1 (2)

2 (8)

3 10)

Far-Western Hill

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (6)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Far-Western Terai

3 (14)

0 (1)

2 (9)

1 (2)

1 (2)

Far-Western Mountain

3 (8)

1 (2)

5 (17)

3 (9)

5 (13)

All Nepal (weighted)

4 (481)

2 (258)

10 (1327)

2 (317)

3 (370)

 

Table A5.5 Households headed by farmers, average land holding and application for agricultural loans by ethnic groups

 Ethnic group

% of hh with farmer as household head

Average area of land (Mean Ropani)

 % families applied for credit and loans

Brahmin

 67 (2087)

15 (3031)

14 (351)

Chettri

81 (2843)

15 (3430)

10 (295)

Newar

44 (394)

8 (931)

7 (38)

Gurung/Ghale

85 (446)

10 (513)

8 (38)

Magar

80 (711)

11 (876)

13 (94)

Rai/Limbu

81 (725)

16 (883)

8 (61)

Tamang/Sherpa

74 (612)

12 (832)

10 (65)

Muslim

51 (341)

13 (659)

17 (63)

Occupational

52 (1420)

6 (2668)

10 (177)

Tharu

74 (913)

25 (1195)

22 (200)

Yadav

83 (753)

29 (882)

18 (140)

Other (Terai)

50 (1004 )

15 (1946)

20 (237)

Other (Hills)

55 (389)

9 (699)

16 (68)

 

Table A5.6 Visits by extension workers, visits to centres and rating of services by ethnic groups

 Ethnic group

% hh visited by JT/JTAs

% hh visited by NGO extension worker

% hh who visited agriculture / livestock centre

 % hh rating agriculture service as 'good'

% hh rating livestock service as 'good'

Brahmin

6 (143)

2 (43)

17 (426)

5 (111)

5 (128)

Chettri

4 (107)

1 (36)

12 (375)

2 (68)

3 (82)

Newar

6 (32)

2 (12)

9 (47)

6 (29)

7 (32)

Gurung/Ghale

2 (7)

7 (33)

4 (19)

1 (2)

1 (5)

Magar

2 (16)

1 (5)

7 (53)

3 (22)

2 (15)

Rai/Limbu

3 (24)

1 (4)

6 (42)

2 (12)

1 (9)

Tamang/Sherpa

3 (18)

2 (14)

4 (28)

2 (14)

1 (8)

Muslim

4 (16)

2 (6)

8 (31)

2 (6)

2 (6)

Occupational

1 (21)

1 (8)

5 (78)

2 (27)

3 (39)

Tharu

4 (36)

1 (7)

9 (86)

1 (11)

3 (22)

Yadav

2 (15)

5 (40)

6 (51)

0 (2)

1 (8)

Other (Terai)

3 (38)

4 (46)

6 (73)

1 (7)

1 (9)

Other (Hills)

2 (8)

1 (4)

4 (18)

2 (6)

2 (7)

 

Figure A5.1 Proportion of households using government health services in last month

Figure A5.2 Proportion of households using other health services in last month

Figure A5.3 Proportion of households who rate the government health service as 'good'

Figure A5.4 Proportion of contacts with government health services with all needed medicines available

 

Figure A5.5 Proportion of contacts with government health services with health worker available 

Figure A5.6 Proportion of households willing to pay for improved health services

Figure A5.7 Percentage of household heads as farmers

 

Figure A5.8 Mean total land holdings (ropani)

Figure A5.9 Percentage of households who applied for an agricultural loan

Figure A5.10 Percentage of households ever visited by JT/JTA

Figure A5.11 Percentage of households ever visited by an NGO agricultural extension worker

Figure A5.12 Percentage of households who have ever visited an agricultural/livestock centre

Figure A5.13 Percentage of households rating government agricultural service as "good"

Figure A5.14 Percentage of households rating government livestock service as ‘good’


Back | Main | Next