Evaluation of the Mwangaza Mashinani Pilot Project in Kilifi and Garissa Counties, Kenya 2019-2021
Kenya, 2019 - 2021
Get MicrodataCreated on
May 11, 2022
Last modified
May 11, 2022
Page views
31125
Downloads
120
Location (Sample) (LOCATION)
Data file: ml_clean_main
Overview
Valid:
943
Invalid:
281
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
2
Width:
20
Range:
1 - 41
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1. Abakaile | 12 |
1.3%
|
| 2 | 2. Balambala | 101 |
10.7%
|
| 3 | 3. Bandari | 39 |
4.1%
|
| 4 | 4. Bulushi | 0 |
0%
|
| 5 | 5. Bungale | 71 |
7.5%
|
| 6 | 6. Chakama | 63 |
6.7%
|
| 7 | 7. Dadaab | 45 |
4.8%
|
| 8 | 8. Dagahley | 0 |
0%
|
| 9 | 9. Dagamra | 41 |
4.3%
|
| 10 | 10. Damajale | 0 |
0%
|
| 11 | 11. Danyere | 8 |
0.8%
|
| 12 | 12. Dertu | 22 |
2.3%
|
| 13 | 13. Diiso | 0 |
0%
|
| 14 | 14. Fafi | 2 |
0.2%
|
| 15 | 15. Gandini | 1 |
0.1%
|
| 16 | 16. Garissa | 0 |
0%
|
| 17 | 17. Hagarbul | 1 |
0.1%
|
| 18 | 18. Hara | 0 |
0%
|
| 19 | 19. Jarajara | 26 |
2.8%
|
| 20 | 20. Kayafungo | 151 |
16%
|
| 21 | 21. Kilifi | 0 |
0%
|
| 22 | 22. Kulan | 0 |
0%
|
| 23 | 23. Kumahumato | 11 |
1.2%
|
| 24 | 24. Labisigale | 14 |
1.5%
|
| 25 | 25. Libahlow | 12 |
1.3%
|
| 26 | 26. Liboi | 0 |
0%
|
| 27 | 27. Mansabubu | 0 |
0%
|
| 28 | 28. Masalani | 52 |
5.5%
|
| 29 | 29. Mitangani | 19 |
2%
|
| 30 | 30. Mtsara wa tsatsu | 42 |
4.5%
|
| 31 | 31. Mwahera | 45 |
4.8%
|
| 32 | 32. Sikley | 4 |
0.4%
|
| 33 | 33. Tsangatsini | 117 |
12.4%
|
| 34 | 34. Welmerer | 0 |
0%
|
| 35 | 35. Bura | 10 |
1.1%
|
| 36 | 36. Nanighi | 11 |
1.2%
|
| 37 | 37. Alikune | 0 |
0%
|
| 38 | 38. Baraki | 0 |
0%
|
| 39 | 39. Kamuthe | 0 |
0%
|
| 40 | 40. Meanera | 0 |
0%
|
| 41 | 41. Dujis | 23 |
2.4%
|
| Sysmiss | 281 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.