Integrated Growth Poles Project 2016, Impact Evaluation, Baseline Survey
Mozambique, 2016
Get Microdata
Reference ID
MOZ_2016_IGPPIE_v01_M
Producer(s)
Francisco Campos, Joao Montalvao, Claire Boxho
Created on
Sep 07, 2022
Last modified
Sep 07, 2022
Page views
99000
Downloads
219
- Data files
- Section_A.dta
- Section_B.dta
- Section_C.dta
- Section_D.dta
- Section_E.dta
- Section_F.dta
- Section_G.dta
- Section_J.dta
- Section_K.dta
- Section_L1.dta
- Section_L2.dta
- Section_M.dta
- Section_N.dta
- Section_Q.dta
- Section_R.dta
- Section_A.dta
- Section_B.dta
- Section_C.dta
- Section_D.dta
- Section_D4.dta
- Section_E.dta
- Section_F.dta
- Section_G.dta
- Section_M.dta
- Section_P.dta
- Section_Q.dta
- Section_T.dta
- Section_V.dta
- Section_X.dta
- Section_Y.dta
Q12.2 Produtos e servicos de cuidado pessoal-Filhas (q12_2a_f)
Data file: Section_Q.dta
Overview
Valid:
2367
Invalid:
625
Minimum:
0
Maximum:
20000
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
305
End:
309
Width:
5
Range:
0 - 20000
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1939 |
81.9%
|
|
| 5 | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| 6 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 10 | 17 |
0.7%
|
|
| 15 | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| 20 | 19 |
0.8%
|
|
| 25 | 5 |
0.2%
|
|
| 30 | 13 |
0.5%
|
|
| 32 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 35 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 40 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 50 | 100 |
4.2%
|
|
| 60 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 70 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 75 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 80 | 10 |
0.4%
|
|
| 100 | 87 |
3.7%
|
|
| 120 | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| 150 | 24 |
1%
|
|
| 180 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 200 | 50 |
2.1%
|
|
| 240 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 250 | 12 |
0.5%
|
|
| 280 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 300 | 16 |
0.7%
|
|
| 350 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 400 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 450 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 500 | 14 |
0.6%
|
|
| 580 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 600 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 800 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 900 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 1000 | 11 |
0.5%
|
|
| 1200 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 1500 | 6 |
0.3%
|
|
| 1600 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 2000 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 2500 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 3500 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 12000 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 20000 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Sysmiss | 625 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.