State Health Investment Project: Impact Evaluation Endline Survey, 2017
Nigeria, 2017
Get Microdata
Reference ID
NGA_2017_HRBFIE-EL_v01_M
Producer(s)
Eeshani Kandpal (World Bank)
Created on
Dec 05, 2022
Last modified
Aug 28, 2024
Page views
103176
Downloads
317
- Data files
- cardio_drugs_noid.dta
- Catchment_Area_noid.dta
- decr_services_noid.dta
- diagnostic_kits_noid.dta
- FP_drugs_noid.dta
- general_drugs_noid.dta
-
Health Facility
(HF1)_noid.dta - HF1_Sect08_noid.dta
- HF1_sect10A_noid.dta
- HF1_Sect10B_noid.dta
- incr_services_noid.dta
- interview_actions_noid.dta
- interview_comments_noid.dta
- malaria_drugs_noid.dta
- obstetric_care_noid.dta
- Q1611_positions_noid.dta
- services_noid.dta
- TB_drugs_noid.dta
- vaccines_noid.dta
- anc_patients_noid.dta
- HF3_HCP_Info_noid.dta
- HF4_HCP_Info_noid.dta
- HF4_patients_noid.dta
- interview_actions_noid.dta
- interview_comments_noid.dta
-
Patient DIRECT
OBSERVATION
(HF3_HF4)_noid.dta - HF5_ASSETS_noid.dta
- HF5_LIVESTOCK_noid.dta
- HF5_patients_noid.dta
- HF6_ASSETS_noid.dta
- HF6_LIVESTOCK_noid.dta
- HF6_patients_noid.dta
- interview_actions_noid.dta
- interview_comments_noid.dta
-
Patient EXIT
INTERVIEW
(HF5_HF6)_noid.dta -
Health Care
Provider
Interviews
(HF7)_noid.dta - HF7_Q202_noid.dta
- interview_actions_noid.dta
- interview_comments_noid.dta
- staff_roster_noid.dta
- Durable_Goods_noid.dta
- hhroster_noid.dta
- interview_actions_noid.dta
- interview_comments_noid.dta
-
NSHIP IE
Midline
Household Women
Questionnaire_noid.dta - Q16_13_noid.dta
- S5C_Assets_noid.dta
- S9_Vaccines_noid.dta
- Sec_05B_noid.dta
- Sec_06A_noid.dta
- Sec_06B_noid.dta
- Sec_06C_noid.dta
- Sec_07_noid.dta
14.05_Oth. Specify the other factor that determines the level of payment for ser (HF7_Q1405_os)
Data file: staff_roster_noid.dta
Overview
Valid:
3222
Invalid:
-
Type:
Discrete
Start:
6984
End:
7064
Width:
81
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3131 |
97.2%
|
||
| Based on their reports. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Category. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Community has none one to help | 1 |
0%
|
|
| computer knowledge, research | 1 |
0%
|
|
| good management | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Good management | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Hardwork | 1 |
0%
|
|
| if they meet up with their targets | 1 |
0%
|
|
| individual performance | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Input | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Ispect facility. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Lack of fraud | 1 |
0%
|
|
| level of performance. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| needs of the facility | 1 |
0%
|
|
| out reach | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Outpatients | 1 |
0%
|
|
| patronage | 1 |
0%
|
|
| performance | 19 |
0.6%
|
|
| Performance | 7 |
0.2%
|
|
| performance and quantity of work | 1 |
0%
|
|
| performance and quantity of work done | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Performance of the facility | 1 |
0%
|
|
| performance. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| personal performance | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Punctuality, relationship with patients | 1 |
0%
|
|
| quantity | 6 |
0.2%
|
|
| Quantity | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| Quantity of services | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Quantity of services delivered. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Quantity of services provided | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| Quantity of services rendered | 7 |
0.2%
|
|
| quantity of work | 5 |
0.2%
|
|
| quantity of work done | 1 |
0%
|
|
| quantity of work done and what they used the money for the previous quarter for.. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Reports on other services | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Services rendered | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Services rendered in the facility | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Social Marketing | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Subsidised services | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Target achieved | 1 |
0%
|
|
| targets | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Targets | 1 |
0%
|
|
| the environment, structures | 1 |
0%
|
|
| The quantity of services provided | 1 |
0%
|
|
| The quantity of services rendered | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| to help the poor | 1 |
0%
|
|
| turn up of patient | 1 |
0%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.