Smallholder Rice Farmers in Ghana’s Kpong and Weta Irrigation Projects

Ghana, 2013 - 2015

Get Microdata

Reference ID

GHA_2013-2014_KIP_v01_M

Producer(s)

Daniel Ayalew Ali, Derick Bowen, Klaus Deininger, Markus Goldstein, Angeli Kirk, Tricia Koroknay-Palicz

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Study website

Created on

Oct 12, 2023

Last modified

Oct 12, 2023

Page views

103051

Enumerator comments (anyadditionalcomments)

Data file: hfdc_s2m2_final

Overview

Valid: 2450

Type: Discrete

Start: 1669

End: 1912

Width: 244

Range: -

Format: character

Questions and instructions

Categories

Value	Category
#each bag of rice is 5 headpans so i selected 45kg. #there are 3 parcels but according to resp he has only 2.
#expenses on combine is 1200cedis #rice bagging on the field is 4headpans per bag.
#parcel 1's harvest costs 1200. #parcel 3's 1100 and parcel 4's 1100 as well.
#respondent is sponsored by gadco but is in the control #he does not know how many bags after drying so i put in 150
#rice bags are 5headpans per bag. #total cost for combine is 1000
#total cost for combine is 1000cedis. #respondent cant remember when herbicide was applied.
..
...
....
1.5 acres of the second parcel was subleted out during the major season. #p5_1, p11_1. this is a merged work to form part of the first one.
1000cadis was paid for total cost for combine harvester
1450 for combine harvester
15:51
17:25
4 people does the scaring.
[no answer]
a person did scaring for 30 collected 210. combine collected combine 1015.
amount paid for cutting is 1020 not 102
be used combine in harvesting parcel two which costs him 350.
both 03, and 04 are cassava and maize farm
combine change 1450 for c3a
combine charged 1000 cedis
combine charged 1020 on the parcel 1.
combine charged 1050
combine charged 1060
combine charged 1100 on parcel 1
combine charged 1150 cedis
combine charged 1150 on parcel 1
combine charged 1500 but that colum doesn't allow 4digits thats why i put zero there
combine charged 2000
combine charged 2400 for the six acers. he uses his own lorry to convey the rice to the drying floor
combine charged.1400
combine collected 1100 cedis
combine fee for m5 is 1100
combine fee is 1100
combine harvest some and left a small portion to be completed by labour because there is water in that place .so combine cj charged 1300
combine harvester charged 1550
combine took 1000 for cutting parcel 2
combine took 1060 on parcel 2
combine took 1100 for cutting 1 hector
combine took 1100 for each parcel
combine took 1200 on pacel 1
combine took 1500 cedis
conbine charged 1300
cost of combined harvester was. 1800gh
cost of cutting and threshing parcel 2 is 1200 cedis
cost of cutting parcel 1 was 1000 and parcel 2 was 1120
cost of cutting parcel 3 was 1400 and parcel 6 was 3600.
cost of cutting parcel was 1200.
cost of cutting was 1200
cost of harvesting parcel ld 1 was 1100 cedis
cost of hiring combine harvestor was 1000
cutting and threshing for parcel ld 1 cost ghc 450
declined
declined from parcel book
declined respondent
description appears for one parcel.
dis regard this survey, it's a missing parcel.
does not know when to plant.
don't have any parcel yet
farm manager is respondent's brother and handed over yield in addition to his for gadco. drying activities did not take place and not ready to mention how much he is compensated for
farm manager says respondent is the sister hence takes only one bag from her.
first parcel cost of harvest was 2000gh. no parcel description for np1 and np2
for chemical application the respondent uses amonia and urea.
from roadside to drying floor is 100gh
gadco harvested the rice wih their own combined harvester
gadco id is cy 3093 and combine fee is 1000
group labourers charged 1050gh for cutting and threshing. she has sign contract with gadco so they have.been collecting some of her rice
has subletted and is not in the parcel bk
he did not farm the major season
he didn't give any paddy rice to gadco
he doesn't cultivate the parcel anymore
he doesn't know the total of paddy rice.before mailing
he had has handed it over.to.the owners
he has decline
he has given his 2nd parcel to his wife to cultivate
he has given his farms to the junior brother and the brother in-law to use for 1 year .he will take it after they have harvest the minor session
he has started planting for the next sesson
he has sublet the farm to a different person
he has subleted his farm
he has subletted his parcel
he has subletted the parcel
he is not going to cultivate minor
he is under treatment. and gadco came for all his paddy rice on the farm after harvest.
he said he is into contract with gadco so.they took 64maxi bags of his paddy rice thus for the parcel at c5
he said he use 1 sachet of surpha 80 for 1 hector
he said he usea 3liters of bounty to spray the two parcels
he said he will take the parcel from her after she has finish the minor session
he said the 2nd parcel was cultivated by someone but water has destroyed all
he said the parcel is for him and not for the wife
he said, the other two parcels named estate land are not rice farms but cassava and maize farm
he used 1 liter to spray the parcel twice. his id is115088 and not 115080
he was the farm manager of these two parcels but now it has been given to a different person who he doesn't know her name.
her id is 114029 and not 141029
her p5 is 2 but she is cultivating only one parcel .that is the one which i have entered
her son is the one managing the farm for her because of her eye problem but she insisted to give most of the answers herself ...... combine fee is 1300
his id is 114041 not 141041
i did not include drying,winnowing, bagging
i didnt give any rice to the gadco people because the also didnt give me any imput to.farm
in the parcel book the respondent have four parcels but two have listed and respondent comfirmed to have two parcels.
it is stated in the parcel book that he has declined
it was raining intermittently at the time of harvesting activities hence it took longer and incurred more cost
labour day for drying was 30 and scaring for parcel 1 was 420
liguid fertilizer was used : boost extract 5milk tins was sprayed on this parcel
mary doesn't stay in the community anymore. so her mother is the one cultivating the parcel
merge
merge parcel
merge wih first parcel. cost of combined harvester was 1200gh
merge with first interview
merge with first parcel
merge with first parcel. combined harverster cost was 1000gh
merge with parcel 1
merge with parcel 1. cost of combined 1250gh
merge with parcel 1. cost of combined 1500gh
merge with parcel 1. cost of combined harvester and chop money 1700gh
merge with parcel 1. cost of combined was 1700gh
merge with parcel1
merge work
merge work ,parcel id 1.
merge work, original survey.
merge work, p5 should be 2 not 1.
merge work, parcel id 3 is not a rice farm.
merge work, parcel id 4,5 is not for the respondent.
merge work, parcel id np1 is not under the weta irrigation project.
merge work, parcel id np1 is not under the weta irrigation scheme
merge work, parcel id np1 is not under the weta irrigation scheme.
merge work, parcel id np1 is not under weta irrigation scheme.
merge work, parcel id np2 should be change to np1.
merge work, parcel id2
merge work, the full survey that was completed for parcel id 4 is for parcel id 3.
merge work, the respondent did not show concern for the interview.
merge work, the respondent was not interview during module 1 survey.
merge work, this respondent did not show cencern for the survey.
merge work, this respondent did not show concern for the interview.
mice have destroyed parcel 1 completely and a large portion of parcel 2. he is no more with gadco.
module 1 was declined by respomdent
module 1 was declined by respondent
no
no more primary cultivater.
not interested in the interview
not ready to be interviewed because of the cleansing of their gods.
not willing to be engaged further
np1 has already been planted.
np1 has no parcel name
np2 is not in the parcel book
np2,np3 is not in the parcel book.
p11 is 1 not np1
p11 is 1 not np1 as indicated in the parcel book
p11 is 1 not np1 as indicated in the parcel book.
p11 is 1,2,4
p11 should be 1,2,4 not 1,2,3
p5 is 3 not 6 as indicated inthe parcel book
p5 is 3 not 6 as indicated inthe parcel book.
p5-1. p11-1. this is part of the first survey.
p5_1, p11_1. this is a merge to the first survey.
p5_2. p11_1, 2. this is a merge to the first survey.
p5_5. p11_1, 2, 3, 4, 5. this is a merge to the first one.
paddy rice is 60bags
paddy rice is28 bags
parcel 1 harvest cost is 1210
parcel 2 is for.someone else
parcel 4 question 24 was gh3000.
parcel 6 of this respondent is not in the parcel book. interview was done on phone
parcel id 1 is not under the wata irrigation scheme
parcel id 1a,1b is not in the parcel book.
parcel id 2 &3 was rented but has been taken away from him. parcel id for rice farm 1 is 1please and not fve
parcel id 2&3 cost 1000 each.
parcel id 4 does not exist in the parcel book. this is a treated respondent.
parcel id np1 is not in the parcel book.
parcel id np1, np2 is not under weta irrigation scheme.
parcel id6 is not under the weta irrigation scheme
parcel name for np1 is blank in the parcel book. the m1 enumerator intended to split parcel 1 into 1a and 1b that is why it appeared in p11 as 1a and 1b. this is because parcel location have been combined.
parcels 2 and 3 are maize and pepper farms respectively and not part of the irrigation scheme
parcels np1 and np2 were not captured in the parcel books hence missing parcels filled for them
part of the harvesting was done manually
permanent labour does not know how much he will receive as pay. 4 bags of fertilizer n not 6.
pertaining to the parcel 1 & 2, the amount spent on 1 is for both but the xception is the manual harvesting
q13 should be topsect-m
q26 should be gh¢1080
q27. do not know the quantity of rice harvested
q27. the respondent do not know the quantity of rice harvested.
q27a captured under 27c parcel id 1 correspond to section 7 c1
q27b should be 0 q27c should be 78
q57 should be 10 days
q64a is 40.00
questions were answered by respondent's husband as she was not available
removed for publication
repond has not finish drying nllc land produce. from kip he got 22.5 #4 bags after drying.
respndent has a farm manager who and was given 3 bags of rice.
respondent cannot really recall the date of some activities performed on the farm
respondent cannot recall the name of the one farming on parcel one
respondent cannot tell when minor season begins as she is no longer farming
respondent cant remember her age and it skip in the farm force
respondent cant tell when she will begin the minor season as her parcel is flooded and being worked and for this same reason she experienced a low yield
respondent code is not in the parcel book so i put in faa
respondent could not recall the exact date for insecticide and fertlizer application as well as other expenditures hence gave a rough estimate
respondent declined m1
respondent declined module 1
respondent declined to be interviewed for module 1
respondent did not engage any hired labour for transporting rice from the farm to the roadside
respondent did not farm during the 2014 major season as a result of subleting her parcel
respondent did not farm on parcels two and three as he gave them out to his brothers
respondent did not give his rice to gadco and sold out all of his rice
respondent did not incur any transport cost by a vehicle as the farm is closer to the drying floor
respondent did not pay any money for the permanent labour cuz she's a friend
respondent did not undertake any scaring on his three parcels.
respondent did not work with gadco last major
respondent did the drying by herself
respondent does not have a phone and says he does not know the name of the one he subleted parcel to. he says he is waiting for some funds if not he will make the gentleman continue the minor
respondent does not have any other parcel other than the first hence parcel 2 and 3 does not apply
respondent does not have the contact of the one he subleted parcel to and might farm next major
respondent does not know landlord's name
respondent does not know when to plant for the minor untill he gets payment from gadco
respondent does not own a second parcel with this description.
respondent doesn't have the number of his subletee
respondent doesn't have the number of the primary cultivator.
respondent gadco id in the tracking sheet does not match that on farmforce
respondent gave her farm manager 7 bags at the market price of 150 cedis each
respondent gave his farm manager 6 bags of rice amounting to 900 at 150 market price each
respondent gave out parcel one to gadco hence there were no post harvest activites and could not tell how many he got after drying
respondent had 19 gmg mini and not maxi for parcel 3.he did scaring by himself for two weeks each on the farms and used family labour for post harvest activities
respondent had a police case with another person who sponsored him so the rice was taken from him on the drying floor, hence nun was taken by gadco plus how many bags is unknown.
respondent had his rice eaten by mice and he used family labour for most activities and the transportion was free as he used his own vehicle
respondent harvested as well as undertook all activities on parcel one and two on same day hence could not give specific details rather totals for all activities which were halved for each parcel.
respondent harvested parcel one and two on same day
respondent has a farm manager and he was given 3 bags of rice
respondent has a farm manager and refused giving out the amount she pays him.
respondent has cultivated already.
respondent has exempted himself from gadco hence he's no longer sponsored by them
respondent has no other parcel other than parcel one and there is no information on parcel two
respondent has not yet taken over his farm
respondent has parcel one and two at the same place hence all activities were carried on same day and could remember total hence halving them for each parcel. parcel three was left fallow
respondent has sublet the parcel and has no land farming on now
respondent has subleted her land and might start farming this minor but not sure of the date
respondent has subleted her parcel and she gets some money likely to start the minor season by herself
respondent has subleted his parcel
respondent has subleted his parcels and in no position to tell when the next minor begins
respondent has subleted out her parcel and does not have his contact
respondent has subleted out her parcel and might start farming next major
respondent has subleted out her parcels and would take over when she is ready
respondent has subleted parcels one and three
respondent has subleted the land and in no position to tell when the minor season begins
respondent has subletes the land to the sister and cant tell when the minor season begins
respondent have 4 parcels but the forth one is not in the irrigation scheme
respondent have already harvested and has replanted so i took informations on that.
respondent in the middle of the interview said parcel one was given to gadco hence drying, winnowing activities do not pertain to it
respondent in the middle of the interview said she could not harvest anything as her farm was eaten up by rodents and other animals.she is not sure when she will begin the minor season
respondent incured 1050 as cost of harvester charge as well as operator fee each on parcel one and two respectively as this figure could not be captured on farm force.
respondent is 49 years as his age did not pop up on farm force. the respondent has subleted out his parcels and would start farming as soon as he is financially sound.
respondent is cultivating another parcel not part of these ones
respondent is no longer farming
respondent is no longer farming as such cannot tell when the minor season will begin
respondent is no longer farming hence cannot tell when minor will begin
respondent is no longer in a positiom to farm as he has been sick for a while now
respondent is no longer under gadco
respondent is not feeling well so when to begin minor season is unknown.
respondent is not ready to do the minor season
respondent is not sure of the harvest date for the land given out and not too sure of starting the minor season himself
respondent is not the one farming hence cant tell when the minor season begins
respondent is not too sure about when she is starting the minor season.
respondent is sick as such only mentioned alice and his educational background could not be obtained
respondent is still not cultivating for the minor season since he's travel
respondent is still not the pc hence date of minor season planting is unknown.
respondent is under treatment but in the control list. plus he's not yet harvested the 2nd parcel this is not under gadco
respondent later mentioned 175 as cost of harvester and not 160. additionally her plot is now 0.5 as she used to share the 1.5 acres with someone
respondent later mentioned that he had given out parcel 2 to gadco hence 4.9 tonnes figure given after drying and bagging
respondent later said he had applied fertilzer two weeks after m1 around 28 august being 3 bags of npk only as top dressing
respondent left parcel 3 fallow
respondent made the wife answer questions related to harvesting as he was hospitalized then
respondent mentioned mice eating up his farm hence poor yield resulting in the minor having been started early
respondent no longer farming as such cant say when minor season begins
respondent not coperative after mentioning he had sublet the parcel
respondent not interested to be interviewed.
respondent not so sure of the date for next cultivation
respondent not too sure about the date he will start the minor season but guessed
respondent not too sure of harvest date and she spent 370 cedis on group labour under harvest activities
respondent paid an additional 150cedis for conveying the harvester to the field.
respondent paid his farm manager with 5 bags of rice at market price of 150 cedis
respondent refuse photo taking
respondent released the last parcel to its owner. parcel as appeared in the parcel book is actually parcel 4 since three is a residential
respondent requested to attend r to an emergency before starting m2 after completing m1
respondent said he conveyed the rice with his own car from the field to the drying area hence did not incur any transport cost
respondent said he did not give out his parcel 3 to gadco though he was financed rather parcel 2
respondent said the plot is 1 acre and not 2 acres
respondent says he gave the parcel to the brother to farm and has a new parcel
respondent says he is not willing to partake in any more interviews
respondent says he started the major very early and as such begun the next minor early october
respondent says his educational background unnecessary
respondent says his parcel 2 is not a maize farm rather a rice farm.
respondent says parcel one is at gate 2 and not 1
respondent says parcel two belongs to the husband and was subleted a long time ago she could tell how much was paid for transport and drying as was done by husband
respondent says parcel two does not belong to her rather the husband and she never farmed on it during the 2014 major season
respondent says she is not farming during the minor season as the one one she has sublet her farm to will still farm
respondent says the fourth parcel is a pepper farm
respondent spent 1100 in all for his harvesting using the harvester as this could not be captured on farm force
respondent spent 1150 on machine service for parcel one and not 115
respondent spent 1440 for parcel one as harvester charge and not 144 on parcel one. he harvested on the same day as they are all on the same block
respondent spent 3800 on parcel 6 as cost of harvester as could not be captured in farm force. respondent said he gave out parcels 4 and 6 out to gadco hence some questions not applicable
respondent subleted his last parcel out
respondent subleted parcel, and will take it back next year's major season.
respondent subleted the parcel and cannot tell when the minor season will begin
respondent subleted the parcel and not in a position to know harvest time
respondent used 1litre of liquid fertilizer (boost extra)
respondent used his own tractor machine in transporting the rice to the dry floor and market centre hence did not incur cost
respondent used his own vehicle in conveying his rice to the drying area and has sublet his second parcel
respondent used his own vehicle in transporting rice from roadside to the drying floor as well as to market centre
respondent used his own vehicle in transporting the rice
respondent used the combine harvester to start harvesting the rice at 900 cedis and engaged manual labour at 1400 to finish cutting and threshing as the machine developed a fault
respondent wants her name out of the research.
respondent wants her name to be taken out of the database
respondent was not sponsored by gadco this season.
respondent was not willing to talk.
respondent will begin minor season on new land as the one in the baseline has been released to the owner
respondent would take his back his farm to start farming this minor but not definite about the date
respondent's id is not in the parcel book so i entered fff as the ccsp parcel id.
respondent's id is not in the parcel book so i typed in fff as the ccsp parcel id.
respondent's wife says her husband was deceased and farm subleted and not in a position to tell his educational background
respondents parcel has been subleted out
respondets code's not in the parcel book so filled in fff as ccsp id, plus he has a farm manager.
rice bags are 5headpans each
rice was bagged in 4 headpan bags from the field
rice was bagged in 5headpan bags from the field
rice was bagged in five headpan bags from the field then measured in 3headpan bags (45kg bags) after drying
scaring cost 150
seriously sick and taken away.
she didnt give any paddy rice to gadco
she doesn't have any idea of the 2nd parcel
she doesn't know the quantity of rice after drying .she said she had 47 after mailing
she gave some rice to gadco
she has a farm manager but insisted to respond to the interview herself
she has declined
she has declined from the parcel book
she has no.parcel yet to decide on when.to plant for next farming session
she has rented the land
she has sublet her farm
she has subleted all the parcels but will.take them.back when the time is due
she has subletted her land for the major session
she is aged and cannot farm anymore
she is aged so she doen't farm amymore.
she is no more part of gadco.
she is no more with gadco.
she refused to be interview
she said , it is her daughter who now cultivate the parcel
sllc will be planted next two weeks. c4 will be next year
stated in parcel book that this person has declined
th respondent has two rice farms and the third parcel listed in the parcel book is his house. when i ask him about the fouth parcel which is not listed in the parcel book, he said he has two rice farms.
the 2nd parcel is for the wife
the 2nd parcel is not a rice parcel hence no details are filled for it.
the amont paid to labours for cutting and threshing is 540 ghana cedis
the bag used in parcel 2 was the 90kg and not 45kg.
the bags rice is measured is 4 headpans per bag
the cost of combine harvester of this 3 hectres was 2700gh
the cost of combined and chop money for parcel one is gh 1900
the cost of first parcel harvest was 1400gh
the cost of manual harvest was 900gh
the cost of parcel 1 harvest was 1100gh only
the cost of the combine harvester was 1050gh
the cultivator of this parcel is dead so k-store gave me these information
the cutting and threshing cost for parcel one was 880gh
the each bag of rice is 4 headpans so i selected 45,kg
the farm was flooded so respondent could not harvest
the first parcel harvest manual cost was 500gh
the first parcel is not up to 1 hector it is left with a small portion to make it a hector
the gadco people didnt give me any imput for the major session.farming.so they didnt come for any of my rice this time around even though i have sign onto their contract.
the interview was completed later in the day.
the land has been taken from her. the p5 is 1 not zero
the land has been taken from him.because of quarrels
the np1 parcel do not have name in the parcel book but the respondent said it is nllc farm.
the parcel 1 farm was flooded so respondent could not harvest any rice
the parcel 2 farm was flooded so the respondent could not harvest
the parcel has been subleted.
the parcel has been taken away from him
the parcel has been taken from her
the parcel id 'np3' section 6 e8 does not exist in the parcel book.
the parcel is a treated parcel.
the parcel is invalid
the parcel was left fallow the major season 2014
the parcel was subleted
the parcels are treated parcels.
the phonenumber i gave is for the one who knows the primary cultivator
the primary cultivator has declined
the reapondent did not know the time she will plant.
the respondent could not proceed the survey because she said she is loosing her breath.
the respondent did not know the time he will plant
the respondent did not know the time she havested some parcels and also she gave the rice to gadco, she also said section 4b9,3a6,3a7 does not belong to her. she also do not know the time she will plant.merge work,parcel id np4 to np9 is what p
the respondent do not know the time she will be planting
the respondent does not know the time he will plant
the respondent does not know the time he will plant.
the respondent does not want to be interviewed.
the respondent done the scaring by himself
the respondent has 2 acres not 1more over the respondent has given the rice after harvesting to a company which name he did not know.
the respondent has declined
the respondent has declined.
the respondent has given 47 bags of rice to gadco.
the respondent has given the paddy on the first parcel to gadco and the second parcel paddy to winco
the respondent has given the paddy to gadco
the respondent has given the paddy to gadco.
the respondent has given the parcel 3 paddy to gadco
the respondent has paid 1000 for four acres ie250 each.
the respondent has paid 150cedis for the transportation of the paddy to the drying floor.
the respondent has paid 2300 for cutting of rice.
the respondent has paid 300 cedis for cutting and threashing.
the respondent has paid 300cedi for cutting and threashing.
the respondent has paid 40cedis for the transportation of the paddy to the drying floor for the first parcel. the second parcel ie np1 is not a treatment parcel.merge work, p5 is 2 for this survey.
the respondent has paid 40cedis for the transportation of the paddy to the drying floor.
the respondent has paid 50 for the transportation of the paddy to the drying floor
the respondent has rejected the interview.
the respondent has two parcels but one is listed in the parcel book and other is not. the other is recorded as missing parcel.
the respondent have given his paddy to gadco, he has also paid 50 for the transportation of the paddy from the roadside to the drying floor.
the respondent havested nothing on parcel id 4
the respondent havested nothing on parcel one
the respondent id should be 267006
the respondent is a treated farmer.
the respondent is a treatment farmer.
the respondent is no more the primary cultivator.
the respondent is no more the primary cultivater of this parcel.
the respondent is no more the primary cultivator of the parcels.
the respondent is no more the primary cultivator.
the respondent is not ready for any interview again.
the respondent is not the primary cultivator of this parcel, or the farm manager during the 2014 major season.
the respondent is not the primary cultivator of this parcel.
the respondent paid 1200 for cutting of the rice not 120.
the respondent paid 40 cedis for the transportation of rice from the roadside to the drying floor.original survey.merge work.
the respondent passed away.
the respondent planted already on 17/10/2014
the respondent refused to be interviewed.
the respondent said, the parcels is at the same place so the two amounted to1 acer. both a7-6 and a7-7 is equal to one acer. so they are not different from each other
the respondent saids she have only one rice farm which is nllc e3 and so the next parcel captured on parcel book is not correct.
the respondeny have paid 70 cedis for the transportion of the paddy to the drying floor.
the rice from the field was bagged in a 5headpans bag, then finally in 3heapans bag.
the rice was left on the parcel without harvesting, because the parcel was flooded. i filled q21 - q77 to complete the questionaire.
the second parcel 'np1' is not under weta irrigation scheme.
the second parcel 'np2' is not under the weta irrigation scheme.
the second parcel cost of combine harvester was 1080gh
the second parcel is a maize farm
the second parcel is for maize farming not rice.
the son.now takes charge of all responsibility on the farm but he insisted to be interviewed
the third parcel is a vegetable farm (avolom f)
the total cost and chop money to hire the combine was 2000gh. this is for the first parcel.
the transport incurred for parcel one to the drying and market place is 90 cedis
the whole farm was flauded.
the whole farm was taken over by birds. nothing was havested.
the wife assisted her n paid her 300.
there also was a manual harvesting
there are 4 parcels in the bool but respondent has only 3 parcels
there is a problem about the parcel so i didn't cultivate it this time around . but when we solve the problem i will begin again
there is no information on the 2nd parcel in the parcels book . and the mane have only only parcel
there's no parcel name for 'np1' in the parcel book so i typed in no name
this is a declined respondent
this is a declined respondent.
this is a merge to the first survey.
this is a treatment respondent
this is part of the first survey done.
this respondent first parcel has a share with gadco ie section 4 e5
this respondent has declined.
this respondent says he is not ready to farm during the minor season.
total cost for combine is 1050 cedis
total cost for combine is 1100
total cost for combine is 1500
total cost of combine for parcel 3 is 1050.
total cost of combine for second parcel is 1930 cedis
total cost of combine harvester is 1100
total cost of combine is 1040.
total cost of combine is 1100
total cost of combine is 1330
total cost of harvester for the 2nd parcel is 1500.
total harvest cost for combine is 1050
treated respondent
two persons did scaring for 30 days and were paid 8 cedis each for a day.
two persons did scaring for 30 ddays and charged 7gh each for a day .
will take his land from edem after he has finish with minor session

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Back to Catalog