Impact Evaluation of the Social Support for Resilient Households Project 2023-2024
Baseline
Malawi, 2023 - 2024
Get Microdata
Reference ID
MWI_2023-2024_SSRLPIE-BL_v01_M
Producer(s)
Emily Beam, Benedetta Lerva
Created on
Feb 19, 2025
Last modified
Feb 19, 2025
Page views
69189
Downloads
459
- Data files
- sslrp_baseline.dta
- hh_roster.dta
- demographics.dta
- migration.dta
- education_roster.dta
- health_roster.dta
- asset_list.dta
- labour_roster.dta
- agricultural_season.dta
- agr_act_hhmbr.dta
- livestock.dta
- lvtk_product_sales.dta
- livestock_raising_member.dta
- nfe_roster.dta
- nfe_purch_assets.dta
- nfe_sold_assets.dta
- nfe_hh_roster.dta
- oth_income.dta
- food_consumption.dta
- nonfood_consumption_week.dta
- nonfood_consumption_month.dta
- nonfood_consumption_three_month.dta
- nonfood_consumption_year.dta
- food_security.dta
- saving_account.dta
- financial_vlsa.dta
- outstanding_loans.dta
- financial_loan.dta
- financial_insurance.dta
- perm_crops.dta
- seasonal_crops.dta
- seasonal_lab_agr_act.dta
- sslrp_baseline_e2.dta
- hh_roster.dta
- demographics.dta
- migration.dta
- education_roster.dta
- health_roster.dta
- asset_list.dta
- labour_roster.dta
- perm_crops.dta
- seasonal_crops.dta
- agricultural_season.dta
- seasonal_lab_agr_act.dta
- agr_act_hhmbr.dta
- livestock.dta
- lvtk_product_sales.dta
- livestock_raising_member.dta
- nfe_roster.dta
- nfe_purch_assets.dta
- nfe_sold_assets.dta
- nfe_hh_roster.dta
- oth_income.dta
- food_consumption.dta
- nonfood_consumption_week.dta
- nonfood_consumption_month.dta
- nonfood_consumption_three_month.dta
- nonfood_consumption_year.dta
- food_security.dta
- saving_account.dta
- financial_vlsa.dta
- outstanding_loans.dta
- financial_loan.dta
- financial_insurance.dta
L.20. People like myself have very little chance of protecting our personal inte (wellb_levens_conflict)
Data file: sslrp_baseline_e2.dta
Overview
Valid:
640
Invalid:
-
Minimum:
1
Maximum:
7
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
3630
End:
3632
Width:
3
Range:
1 - 7
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| -66 | Refused to answer | 0 |
0%
|
| 1 | Strongly disagree | 39 |
6.1%
|
| 2 | Disagree | 77 |
12%
|
| 3 | Slightly disagree | 9 |
1.4%
|
| 4 | Neither agree nor disagree | 32 |
5%
|
| 5 | Slightly agree | 56 |
8.8%
|
| 6 | Agree | 219 |
34.2%
|
| 7 | Strongly agree | 208 |
32.5%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.