Domestic Tourism Survey 2022
South Africa, 2022 - 2023
Get Microdata
Reference ID
ZAF_2022_DTS_v01_M
Producer(s)
Statistics South Africa
Metadata
Created on
Aug 12, 2025
Last modified
Aug 12, 2025
Page views
13654
Downloads
216
- Data files
- dts-2022-day-v1
- dts-2022-night-v1
District of destination (Q24DISTRICT)
Data file: dts-2022-day-v1
Overview
Valid:
213853
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Width:
51
Range:
11 - 99
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 11. City of Cape Town Metropolitan Municipality | 305 |
0.1%
|
| 12 | 12. West Coast District Municipality | 281 |
0.1%
|
| 13 | 13. Cape Winelands Municipality | 360 |
0.2%
|
| 14 | 14. Overberg District Municipality | 82 |
0%
|
| 15 | 15. Garden Route District Municipality | 126 |
0.1%
|
| 16 | 16. Central Karoo District Municipality | 6 |
0%
|
| 17 | 17. Do not know | 21 |
0%
|
| 18 | 18. Sarah Baartman District Municipality | 126 |
0.1%
|
| 19 | 19. Amatole District Municipality | 155 |
0.1%
|
| 20 | 20. Chris Hani District Municipality | 168 |
0.1%
|
| 21 | 21. Joe Gqabi District Municipality | 42 |
0%
|
| 22 | 22. OR Tambo District Municipality | 144 |
0.1%
|
| 23 | 23. Alfred Nzo District Municipality | 93 |
0%
|
| 24 | 24. Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan | 170 |
0.1%
|
| 25 | 25. Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality | 279 |
0.1%
|
| 26 | 26. Do not Know | 7 |
0%
|
| 27 | 27. John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality | 194 |
0.1%
|
| 28 | 28. Namakwa District Municipality | 158 |
0.1%
|
| 29 | 29. Pixley Ka Seme District Municipality | 100 |
0%
|
| 30 | 30. ZF Mgcawu District Municipality | 206 |
0.1%
|
| 31 | 31. Frances Baard District Municipality | 243 |
0.1%
|
| 32 | 32. Do not know | 9 |
0%
|
| 33 | 33. Xhariep District Municipality | 43 |
0%
|
| 34 | 34. Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality | 137 |
0.1%
|
| 35 | 35. Lejweleputswa District Municipality | 67 |
0%
|
| 36 | 36. Thabo Mofutsanyane District Municipality | 172 |
0.1%
|
| 37 | 37. Fezile Dabi District Municipality | 133 |
0.1%
|
| 38 | 38. Do not know | 48 |
0%
|
| 39 | 39. Ugu District Municipality | 68 |
0%
|
| 40 | 40. uMgungundlovu District Municipality | 90 |
0%
|
| 41 | 41. uThukela District Municipality | 14 |
0%
|
| 42 | 42. uMzinyathi District Municipality | 19 |
0%
|
| 43 | 43. Amajuba District Municipality | 6 |
0%
|
| 44 | 44. Zululand District Municipality | 32 |
0%
|
| 45 | 45. uMkhanyakude District Municipality | 255 |
0.1%
|
| 46 | 46. uThungulu District Municipality | 107 |
0.1%
|
| 47 | 47. iLembe District Municipality | 55 |
0%
|
| 48 | 48. Harry Gwala District Municipality | 41 |
0%
|
| 49 | 49. Ethekwini Metropolitan Municipality | 215 |
0.1%
|
| 50 | 50. Do not know, | 6 |
0%
|
| 51 | 51. Bojanala District Municipality | 412 |
0.2%
|
| 52 | 52. Ngaka Modiri Molema District Municipality | 62 |
0%
|
| 53 | 53. Dr Ruth Segomotsi Mompati District Municipality | 186 |
0.1%
|
| 54 | 54. Dr Kenneth Kaunda District Municipality | 119 |
0.1%
|
| 55 | 55. Do not know | 98 |
0%
|
| 56 | 56. Sedibeng District Municipality | 110 |
0.1%
|
| 57 | 57. West Rand District Municipality | 90 |
0%
|
| 58 | 58. Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality | 227 |
0.1%
|
| 59 | 59. City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality | 446 |
0.2%
|
| 60 | 60. City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality | 942 |
0.4%
|
| 61 | 61. Do not know, | 52 |
0%
|
| 62 | 62. Gert Sibande District Municipality | 221 |
0.1%
|
| 63 | 63. Nkangala District Municipality | 144 |
0.1%
|
| 64 | 64. Ehlanzeni District Municipality | 239 |
0.1%
|
| 65 | 65. Do not know | 49 |
0%
|
| 66 | 66. Mopani District Municipality | 744 |
0.3%
|
| 67 | 67. Vhembe District Municipality | 262 |
0.1%
|
| 68 | 68. Capricorn District Municipality | 344 |
0.2%
|
| 69 | 69. Waterberg District Municipality | 195 |
0.1%
|
| 70 | 70. Greater Sekhukhune District Municipality | 130 |
0.1%
|
| 71 | 71. Do not know | 24 |
0%
|
| 88 | 88. Not applicable | 203779 |
95.3%
|
| 99 | 99. Unspecified | 195 |
0.1%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.