IHSN Survey Catalog
  • Home
  • Microdata Catalog
  • Citations
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / GBR_1851_PHC-GBR_V01_M_V7.5_A_IPUMS / variable [P]
central

Census of the Population 1851 - IPUMS Subset

United Kingdom [Great Britain], 1851
Get Microdata
Reference ID
GBR_1851_PHC-GBR_v01_M_v7.5_A_IPUMS
Producer(s)
Secretary of State, IPUMS
Metadata
Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON
Study website
Created on
Sep 03, 2025
Last modified
Sep 03, 2025
Page views
144
  • Study Description
  • Data Dictionary
  • Get Microdata
  • Data files
  • GBR1851_PHC-GBR-H-H
  • GBR1851_PHC-GBR-P-H

Institutional location of an individual (UK1851C_INSTIT)

Data file: GBR1851_PHC-GBR-P-H

Overview

Type: Discrete
Start: 719
End: 719
Width: 1
Range: -
Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Categories
Value Category
1 not resident in an institution
4 originally thought to be (1) but program alters this to institution
6 originally thought to be (1) but program alters this to on board boat
7 resident in an institution
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Description

Definition
This variable lists the institutional location of an individual. This variable was created by programming.

The transcripts of the British 1851 census are from the 2% sample, transcribed by a team under Professor Michael Anderson at Edinburgh. The inclusion of institutional population in the 1851 sample was created by Professor Michael Anderson. According to Anderson " Institutions were sampled by treating all the institutional populations as if they were one continuous list and then systematically selecting twenty individuals from each successive one thousand names. Where institutions included families, special arrangements were made; in these cases the sample was drawn so as to include all members of families the first member of which appeared before the twentieth individual, and to exclude members of families where only the later members appeared within a block of twenty names. Proceeding in these ways, 980 separate 'data clusters' were identified, either directly from the published Reports or, in most cases, by tediously counting the enumeration books and selecting the fiftieth in each stratum sequence".

However, some inconsistencies remain and programming altered some of the values in the institutional population so that the1881 and 1851 census are comparable. The four variables that help define the institutional location of an individual are, rectype (record type) allocated by the data parsing program; second the address (GB51A007) given in the enumerators' books; third the relationship (GB51A411) between the number of related kin within the household and fourth the size of the household.

The combination of these variables can be summarized as follows:

If the household is not already defined as an institution, has more than 20 residents of whom 10 or more have a relationship to head of household which are 'miscellaneous' (i.e., not kin, not inmates, not boarders, not lodgers, not servants and not visitors) then the household shall be defined as an institution.

If the household is not already defined as an institution and there are more than 20 residents, more than two‐thirds are institutional inmates, household inmates, family inmates or servants, then the household shall be defined as an institution.

If the household is not already defined as an institution and there is a valid 'institution‐word' in the address, there are more than six residents and the ratio of kin to non‐kin is greater than 0.8 then the household is redefined as an institution.

If the household is defined as an institution, there is no valid institution word in the address, there are less than 24 residents and the ratio of kin to non‐kin is less than 0.8 then the household is redefined as an ordinary household.

If the household is defined as an ordinary household and there is a valid 'vesselword' then the household is redefined as a vessel.
For each of these alterations a different new record type is created which serves the purpose of a check variable. For example, the first three of these types would result in the variable instit being set to 4, which indicates that it would have been 1 had not the program altered it.
Universe
United Kingdom 1851 (2%) [Great Britain]: All persons

concept

Concept
Back to Catalog
IHSN Survey Catalog

© IHSN Survey Catalog, All Rights Reserved.