IND_1987_NSS43-SCH10_v01_M
National Sample Survey 1987-1988 (43rd Round) - Schedule 10 - Employment and Unemployment
Name | Country code |
---|---|
India | IND |
Socio-Economic/Monitoring Survey [hh/sems]
The NSSO carried out the first quinquennial survey on employment - unemployment in the 27th round (September 1972 - October 1973). This first survey made a marked departure from the earlier employment surveys of NSSO in procedure and content. The concepts and procedure followed in this survey were primarily based on the recommendations of the 'Expert Committee on Unemployment Estimates' (1970). since then, the three successive quinquennial surveys conducted in 32nd (July 1977 - June 1978), 38th (January - December 1983) rounds have more or less followed an identical approach in the measurement of employment and unemployment. Continuing in this series this was the fourth quinquennial survey conducted as 43rd round from July 1987-June 1988.
The Employment and Unemployment surveys of National sample Survey (NSS) are primary sources of data on various indicators of labour force at National and State levels. These are used for planning, policy formulation, decision support and as input for further statistical exercises by various Government organizations, academicians, researchers and scholars. NSS surveys on employment and un-employment with large sample size of households have been conducted quinquennially from 27th. round(October'1972 - September'1973) onwards. Cotinuing in this series the fourth such all-india survey on the situation of employment and unemployment in India was carried out during the period july 1987 - june 1988 .
The working Group set up for planning of the entire scheme of the survey, among other things, examined also in detail some of the key results generated from the 38th round data and recommended some stream-lining of the 38th round schedule for the use in the 43rd round. Further, it felt no need for changing the engaging the easting conceptual frame work. However, some additional items were recommended to be included in the schedule to obtain the necessary and relevant information for generating results to see the effects on participation rates in view of the ILO suggestions.5.0.1. The NSSO Governing Council approved the recommendations of the working Group and also the schedule of enquiry in its 44th meeting held on 16 January, 1987. In this survey, a nation-wide enquiry was conducted to provide estimates on various characteristics pertaining to employment and unemployment in India and some characteristics associated with them at the national and state levels. Information on various facets of employment and unemployment in India was collected through a schedule of enquiry (schedule 10).
Sample survey data [ssd]
Randomly selected households based on sampling procedure and members of the household
The NSSO surveys on employment and unemployment aim to measure the extent of eemploymentf and eunemploymentf in quantitative terms disaggregated by various household and population characteristics . The persons surveyed are classified in to various activity categories on the basis of the activities pursue d by them during certain specified reference periods. Three reference periods are used in thes e surveys. These are (i) one year (ii) one week and (iii) each day of the week. Based on these th ree periods three different measures are arrived at. These are termed as usual status, current weekly status ,and the current daily status .The Schedule on employment and unemployment (Schedule 10 ) framed for the 43rd round survey consisted of 11 blocks.
The survey covered the whole of Indian Union excepting
i) Ladakh and Kargil districts of Jammu & Kashmir
ii) Rural areas of Nagaland
Name | Affiliation |
---|---|
National Sample Survey Organisation | Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MOSPI) |
Name | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Survey Design Research Division | National Sample Survey Office | Questionnaire Desgn, Sampling methodology,Survey Reports |
Field Operations Division | National Sample Survey Office | Field Work |
Data Processing Division | National Sample Survey Office | Data Processing |
Computer Centre | M/o Statistcs and Programme Implementation(MOSPI) | Tabulation and Dissemination |
Name |
---|
M/o Statistics & Programme Implementation |
Name | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Governing council and Working Group | Government of India | Finalisation of survey study and Questionnaire |
It may be mentioned here that in order to net more households of the upper income bracket in the Sample , significant changes have been made in the sample design in this round (compares to the design of the 38th round).
SAMPLE DESIGN AND SAMPLE SIZE
The survey had a two-stage stratified design. The first stage units (f.s.u.'s) are villages in the rural sector and urban blocks in the urban sector. The second stage units are households in both the sectors.
Sampling frame for f.s.u.'s : The lists of 1981 census villages constituted the sampling frame for rural sector in most districts. But the 1981 census frame could not be used for a few districts because, either the 1981 census was not held there or the list of 1981 census villages could not be obtained or the lists obtained from the census authorities were found to be grossly incomplete. In such cases 1971 census frame were used. In the urban sector , the Urban Frame Survey (U.F.S.) blocks constituted the sampling frame.
STRATIFICATION : States were first divided into agro-economic regions which are groups of contiguous districts , similar with respect to population density and crop pattern. In Gujarat, however , some districts have been split for the purpose of region formation In consideration of the location of dry areas and the distribution of the tribal population in the state. The composition of the regions is given in the Appendix.
RURAL SECTOR: In the rural sector, within each region, each district with 1981Census rural population less 1.8 million formed a single stratum. Districts with larger population were divided into two or more strata, depending on population, by grouping contiguous tehsils similar, as for as possible, in respect of rural population Density and crop pattern. (In Gujarat, however , in the case of districts extending over more than one region, even if the rural population was less than 1.8 million, the portion of a district falling in each region constituted a separate stratum. Further ,in Assam the old "basic strata" formed on the basis of 1971 census rural population exactly in the above manner, but with cut-off population as 1.5 million have been retained as the strata for rural sampling.)
URBAN SECTOR : In the urban sector , strata were formed , again within NSS region , on the basis of the population size class of towns . Each city with population 10 lakhs or more is self-representative , as in the earlier rounds . For the purpose of stratification, in towns with '81 census population 4 lakhs or more , the blocks have been divided into two categories , viz . : One consisting of blocks in areas inhabited by the relatively affluent section of the population and the other consisting of the remaining blocks. The strata within each region were constituted as follows :
Note : There is no region with more than one city with population 1 million and above. The stratum number have been retained as above even if in some regions some of the strata are empty.
Allocation for first stage units : The total all-India sample size was allocated to the states /U.T.'s proportionate to the strength of central field staff. This was allocated to the rural and urban sectors considering the relative size of the rural and urban population. Now the rural samples were allocated to the rural strata in proportion to rural population. The urban samples were allocated to the urban strata in proportion to urban population with double weight age given to those strata of towns with population 4 lakhs or more which lie in area inhabited by the relatively affluent section. All allocations have been adjusted such that the sample size for stratum was at least a multiple of 4 (preferably multiple of 8) and the total sample size of a region is a multiple of 8 for the rural and urban sectors separately.
Selection of f.s.u.'s : The sample villages have been selected circular systematically with probability proportional to population in the form of two independent interpenetrating sub-samples (IPNS) . The sample blocks have been selected circular systematically with equal probability , also in the form of two IPNS' s.
As regards the rural areas of Arunachal Pradesh, the procedure of 'cluster sampling' was:- The field staff will be supplied with a list of the nucleus villages of each cluster and they selected the remaining villages of the cluster according to the procedure described in Section Two. The nucleus villages were selected circular systematically with equal probability, in the form of two IPNS 's.
Hamlet-group and sub-blocks : Large villages and blocks were sub- divided into a suitable number of hamlet-groups and sub-blocks respectively having equal population convent and one them was selected at random for surveys.
Hamlet-group and sub-blocks : Large villages and blocks were sub- divided into a suitable number of hamlet-groups and sub-blocks respectively having equal population convent and one them was selected at random for surveys.
Selection of households : rural : In order to have adequate number of sample households from the affluent section of the society, some new procedures were introduced for selection of sample households, both in the rural and urban sectors. In the rural sector , while listing households, the investigator identified the households in village/ selected hamlet- group which may be considered to be relatively more affluent than the rest. This was done largely on the basis of his own judgment but while exercising his judgment considered factors generally associated with rich people in the localitysuch as : living in large pucca house in well-maintained state, ownership/possession of cultivated/irrigated land in excess of certain norms. ( e.g.20 acres of cultivated land or 10 acres of irrigated land), ownership of motor vehicles and costly consumer durables like T.V. , VCR, VCP AND refrigerator, ownership of large business establishment , etc. Now these "rich" households will form sub-stratum 1. (If the total number of households listed is 80 or more , 10 relatively most affluent households will form sub-stratum 1. If it is below 80, 8 such households will form sub-stratum 1. The remaining households will 'constitute sub-stratum 2. At the time of listing, information relating to each household' s major sources of income will be collected, on the basis of which its means of livelihood will be identified as one of the following : "self-employed in non-agriculture " "rural labour" and "others" (see section Two for definition of these terms) . Also the area of land possessed as on date of survey will be ascertained from all households while listing. Now the households of sub-stratum 2 will be arranged in the order : (1)self-employed in non-agriculture, (2) rural labour, other households, with land possessed (acres) : (3) less than 1.00 (4) 1.00-2.49,(5)2.50-4.99, (6) 5.00-9.99 and (7) 10.00 or more. 2 sample households will be selected from sub-stratum 1 circular systematically with a random start. In the case of sub-stratum 2,8 households will be selected from the arranged frame, also circular systematically with random start.
Selection of households : Urban: At the time of listing, information on the major sources of income will be ascertained from each household, based on which its mean of livelihood class will be identified as one of the following : (a) self-employed , (b) regular wage/ salaried employee , (c) casual labour and (d) others. Further , the average monthly consumer expenditure and the household size will also be ascertained from each household from which its (average monthly ) per capita expenditure (pce) will be obtained . Now , in all towns except those with population 10 lakhs or more all households with pce Rs. 800/-or more will from sub-stratum 1 ( the affluent or rich section) and the rest , sub-stratum 2. In towns with population 10 lakhs or more , households with pce Rs,1000/-or more will constitute sub-stratum 1 and the others, sub-stratum 2 Households of sub-stratum to m.1. classes (a) and (b) above will be assigned to one of the three pce classes : (1) less than 'A' , (2) 'A' to 'B' : A and B have been determined at states / U.T. level such that the above three pce classes will roughly include , respectively , the lowest 30 %, the middle 60% and the top 10% of the population for state/U.T. The values of A and B are given state wise in Section 2 ). The households of sub-stratum 2 will be arranged by means of livelihood x pce class thus : a-1, a-2, a-3, b-3,b-2, b-1, c, d where a b,c and d stand for the m.1. classes and 1,2 and 3 for the pce classes as given above . Now, in the affluent strata of towns with population 4 lakhs or more, households will be selected from sub-stratum 1 and 6 from sub-stratum 2 . In the remaining strata , 2 household will be selected from sub-stratum 1 and 8 from sub-stratum 2 as in the rural sector . The required number of sample households will be selected separately from each sub-stratum circular systematically with a random start .
Sample size ( central sample ) : The all India sample in respect of the central sample consisted of 8518 villages and 4648 blocks
Three different weightsare provided in each record of filess in the data set. Deatils are as follows:-
Start | End |
---|---|
1987-07 | 1988-06 |
Name | Affiliation |
---|---|
Field Operations Division of Naional Sample Survey Office | Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation |
The survey period of one year was divided into four equal sub-rounds as described in dates of collection
Use of the dataset must be acknowledged using a citation which would include:
Example:
National Sample Survey Office. India National Sample Survey 1987-1988 (43rd Round) - Schedule 10 - Employment and Unemployment. Ref. IND_1987_NSS43-SCH10_v01_M. Data downloaded from [web] on [date].
The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
Name | Affiliation | URL | |
---|---|---|---|
The World Bank Microdata Library | The World Bank | microdata@worldbank.org | http://microdata.worldbank.org |
DDI_IND_1987_NSS43-SCH10_v01_M
Name | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Computer Centre | M/O Statistics & Programme Implementation | Ducumentation of the study |
Development Economics Data Group | World Bank | Ducumentation of the DDI |
Version 01 (July 2013) - Adapted version of a DDI "DDI-IND-MOSPI-NSSO-43Rnd-Sch10-1993-94" received from Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation.