Value |
Category |
"Interesting" interviewing situation |
|
"Marginalised" person |
|
Answers were highly precise |
|
Bad hearing; did not quite understand all questions; wife died recently |
|
Considered before agreeing to interview; answered with seriousness |
|
Difficult!!! |
|
Due to numerous hospital-visits remembering a particular visit difficult |
|
Enthusiastic IP, friendly |
|
Estimating money figures very difficult for the IP |
|
Family had been on a trip when the child fell ill --> quick treatment in HK |
|
First one of this project; started well |
|
Housewife with a lot of kids. Husband also unemployed. |
|
I'm not sure if IP understood the idea behing vignettes |
|
IP apparently suffers from serious mental problems; wife in hospital 3 y. |
|
IP asked to mention that public health centers haven't been able to help |
|
IP busy and somehow suspicious |
|
IP changed her opinion which resulted in numerous corrections |
|
IP commented that public and private health care should be separated |
|
IP commented the formulation of the questions |
|
IP complained about the bad Finnish translation |
|
IP complained about the length of operation queues. |
|
IP complained that there is no freedom of choice in health centers |
|
IP could not concentrate very well |
|
IP couldn't quite concentrate, and was rather uneasy |
|
IP couldn't quite step into other person's shoes in vignettes |
|
IP did not know of all household expenses |
|
IP did not understand the idea behind vignettes |
|
IP felt that questions were remote because on good health. |
|
IP felt that service at Hatanpää health center was busy, indifferent |
|
IP friendly |
|
IP had bad memory. Children took care of all money affairs. |
|
IP had difficulties in grasping the idea behind vignettes |
|
IP had difficulties in grasping the idea behind vignettes at first |
|
IP had difficulties with consentrating. |
|
IP had difficulties with vignettes and health system priorities. |
|
IP had great difficulties in health system priorities. |
|
IP had multiple illnesses but was hopeful |
|
IP had some diffuculties in following vignettes |
|
IP has been an interviewer; appeared to try to mislead by giving strange an |
|
IP has had 2 strokes during past two years; difficult interview |
|
IP has waited for an operation for two years! |
|
IP is a journalist; influenced the interview a bit |
|
IP laughed constantly at some recurrent expressions |
|
IP participated willingly |
|
IP proceeded slowly - took time to remember things |
|
IP quite interested |
|
IP said that he has mental problems without implications with the IW. |
|
IP strongly criticized the illogicality of the vignettes. |
|
IP talked about herself a lot |
|
IP thought she's more of a producer, not user of health services |
|
IP thought vignettes' answer options were incoherent |
|
IP used strangely answering options strangely sparigly. |
|
IP very suspicious at first; gave relevant answers though |
|
IP very suspicious at the beginning, hard to get opinions. |
|
IP wanted to get info about the results if possible |
|
IP wanted to get the results if possible |
|
IP was a pharmacist |
|
IP was born in Russia, spoke Finnish well. |
|
IP was enthusiastic because of own profession |
|
IP was enthusiastic because of the topic. |
|
IP was incoherent |
|
IP was interested in topics. |
|
IP was interested in vignettes because of peculiar methodology |
|
IP was nearly blind, but was capable of answering w/out cards |
|
IP was suspicious but open; explained choices thoroughly |
|
IP was uncommonly healty and spry for her age |
|
IP was uncooperative in the beginning but things got better. |
|
IP was very motivated because of own (often negative) experiences |
|
IP was very slow and intricate |
|
IP was very tired and not very concentrated |
|
IP was very tired; couldn't concentrate well - just came from work |
|
IP's husband had died about 1 year ago in a car accident --> sadness |
|
Looked healthy, answered clearly. |
|
Memory intact |
|
Mental problems did not became evident during the interview itself |
|
Nice person, but was horrified about possible retest interview. |
|
Nice to meet a totally normal person for a change. |
|
No-nonsense person, good memory and calm |
|
Occassionally answers felt a bit confused - memory not at its best… |
|
Otherwise OK, but IP's Finnish was not that good. |
|
Otherwise OK. |
|
Perhaps a little reserved, but at the same time interested attitude |
|
Person with 1st birthday was not available because of work assignement |
|
Person with 1st birthday was too weak to participate |
|
Person with first birthday was unavailable (in hospital) |
|
Proceeded normally. Some questions raised questions. |
|
Quite OK even if IP's mother tongue is Swedish. |
|
Quite OK, even if took quite a long time. |
|
Refused to give birth dates; otherwise very pleasant |
|
Regarding depression, IP told that a close person had died recently |
|
S0800: Cost of a new building happened to accumulate to this month |
|
S7311: Total cost of the illness |
|
Sharp old lady! |
|
Speaks Finnish well enough |
|
Thinking took some time; was interested in the topic |
|
Transitions and "you/your child" -expressions very confusing |
|
Two elderly persons who resiliently try to get along. |
|
Uncommonly healthy person. |
|
Very charming older lady - srpy and good memory |
|
Very friendly athmosphere - I felt appreciated. |
|
Very friendly household. |
|
Very interested in answering |
|
Very nice athmosphere |
|
Very nice. |
|
Very pleasant and cooperative IP |
|
Very sporty person. |
|
Very up in the years, but does everything himself |
|
Went quickly |
|
Went quite well despite of Swedish mother-tongue |
|
Went very well |
|
Wonderful IP, gave an interview willingly |
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.